Skip to main content

Security report for 4grain.lv

SIA “4 GRAIN” · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

30/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

4grain.lv represents a Latvian small business specializing in agricultural machinery focused on grain handling solutions including dryers, storage towers, transport equipment, and cleaning machines. The company provides installation and servicing, targeting agricultural enterprises and grain industry professionals in Latvia and possibly the Baltic region. The website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure is moderate with standard plugins and some minor server configuration issues affecting the Facebook feed plugin. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Contact information is provided with a physical address and phone number, but no email addresses or privacy policies are present. Overall, the website is professional and relevant to its niche but would benefit from improved security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4grain.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
30

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche manufacturing sector serving the agricultural grain handling market. Its business model is B2B, selling specialized machinery and providing related services. The presence of bank details and registration number indicates legitimate business operations. The website content and structure suggest a stable regional presence but limited digital marketing sophistication. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital presence and improving compliance with data protection regulations.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and anonymizes IP addresses in Google Analytics, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The Facebook feed plugin error suggests server configuration issues that could affect reliability. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, indicating a gap in security transparency. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential HTTP security headers to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Resolve server configuration issues affecting third-party plugins like the Facebook feed.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance contact information with verified company emails and incident response contacts.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “4 GRAIN”
Registration number
40203036375
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “4 GRAIN”
Description
4grain.lv is a Latvian company specializing in grain handling technology and solutions, offering products such as grain dryers, storage towers, transport equipment, and cleaning machines. They also provide installation and service support.
Key services
Grain dryers, Storage towers, Transport equipment, Cleaning machines, Installation and service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.1.7, jQuery 3.6.1, Bootstrap (navbar classes detected), Google Analytics, Custom Facebook Feed plugin
Frameworks
Understrap (WordPress theme framework)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes physical address and phone number but no email addresses found.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics tracking.
  6. Some plugin errors visible (Facebook feed) indicating server config issues.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Content is relevant and professional for agricultural machinery sector.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.1.7 using the Understrap theme framework and jQuery 3.6.1. It employs Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with a clear navigation structure. Some technical debt is evident from plugin errors and lack of security headers. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4grain.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4grain.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.