Skip to main content

Security report for 3event.eu

Other · N/a

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 3mag.eu/en/events serves as a regional event calendar for the tri-border area encompassing parts of Germany, Czech Republic, and Poland. It offers a well-structured platform for users to discover various events such as festivals, music concerts, art exhibitions, sports activities, and more. The site targets a general audience interested in cultural and leisure activities within this geographic region. The business model revolves around event promotion and information dissemination, positioning itself as a key regional event aggregator. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and libraries like Flatpickr for date selection and Embla Carousel for event display. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, providing a good user experience. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform from the provided data. Hosting and domain registration are managed through RegistryGate GmbH, a reputable registrar. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs), but no explicit security headers or policies were detected in the HTML content. There is a lack of visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting transparency and user trust. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security hardening, and clearer business contact information to improve trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 3event.eu

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 3event.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for 3event.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

3mag.eu operates as a niche event listing platform focused on the tri-border region, serving local communities and visitors interested in cultural and leisure events. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content and multi-language support (English, German, Czech, Polish). The platform likely generates revenue through event promotion or partnerships, although no explicit monetization details are visible. The target customers are event attendees and organizers within the region. The site shows signs of a small to medium-sized operation with a regional focus. Partnerships or parent company information are not disclosed, suggesting independent operation. The platform's ecosystem includes event categories, search and filtering capabilities, and integration with a magazine site (3mag.eu).

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR, which could expose the business to regulatory risks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which may reduce privacy concerns but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the site should improve security headers, privacy compliance, and provide clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including business email and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Establish an incident response policy and publish contact channels for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
All events in Zittau, Liberec, Jelena Gora and the three-country region ✔ Concerts ✔ Theater ✔ Leisure and much more ➤ Find out more now!
Key services
Event calendar, Event search and filtering, Event category browsing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Flatpickr (date picker), Embla Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a comprehensive event calendar for the tri-border region including Germany, Czech Republic, and Poland.
  2. Multiple event categories are well organized and accessible.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the events page.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. The site uses modern front-end technologies and responsive design.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain registered via a reputable registrar without privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with responsive design and interactive components like carousels and date pickers. The HTML structure is well-organized with semantic tags and meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). However, no backend or CMS details are evident. Performance appears moderate with optimized images and lazy loading. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by canonical links and meta descriptions. The site lacks visible analytics or marketing tools, which could be an opportunity for growth. Hosting details are limited to registrar information; no CDN or cloud provider is identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 3event.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3event.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.