Skip to main content

Security report for 3dorszagjaro.hu

FORUM HUNGARICUM · Other · Hungary

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

3dorszagjaro.hu is a Hungarian website dedicated to providing virtual 3D tours of cultural heritage sites across Hungary. The platform showcases 128 digitized locations, enabling users to explore these sites virtually. The business operates in a niche market focused on cultural tourism and digital heritage preservation. The website is built on WordPress and employs common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics for tracking visitor interactions. The site is well designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, providing a positive user experience. However, it lacks some privacy compliance features such as a cookie consent mechanism and does not provide direct contact information or detailed security policies. The domain registration is consistent with the business age and content, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate technical maturity and a good content offering but could improve in security and privacy compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 3dorszagjaro.hu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets cultural tourists and heritage enthusiasts in Hungary, offering virtual access to historical buildings and landmarks. Its business model revolves around digital content provision and virtual tours, likely supported by cultural or governmental funding given the 'FORUM HUNGARICUM' branding. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive catalog of digitized sites and the use of 3D scanning technology. The absence of direct commercial elements such as e-commerce or advertising suggests a focus on informational and cultural value rather than revenue generation. The website's partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth potential may depend on expanding virtual tours and enhancing user engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and security policies indicates partial compliance with privacy regulations. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FORUM HUNGARICUM
Description
The website offers virtual tours of 128 cultural heritage sites in Hungary, digitized using 3D scanning technology. It invites visitors to explore these sites virtually and encourages real-life visits. The content focuses on historical buildings and cultural landmarks.
Key services
3D virtual tours, Cultural heritage digitalization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Simple Banner plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on Hungarian cultural heritage virtual tours.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  4. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant but cookie consent is missing.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  7. No visible security headers detected; SSL is enabled.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No advertising networks detected except Google Analytics tracking.
  10. No social media links or company contact details found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern tech stack including jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads external CSS and JS resources efficiently and is mobile optimized. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Google site verification included. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements as well as performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 3dorszagjaro.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3dorszagjaro.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.