Skip to main content

Security report for 2oom.cz

IDENTITY – grafické studio & agentura · Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

39/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IDENTITY is a Czech graphic design studio and agency established in 2011, specializing in corporate identity and branding services. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking professional graphic design solutions, with a focus on logo creation and brand development. The website reflects a consistent and professional brand image, supported by a portfolio of projects and active social media channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like YOOtheme and UIkit, integrating analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security measures include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and credible business presence with good digital maturity.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 2oom.cz

This scan found 12 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
Average
39

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small essential entity within the graphic design sector, serving primarily local or regional clients in the Czech Republic. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on branding and corporate identity design. The website's portfolio and social media presence suggest active client engagement and a diverse project base. The absence of terms of service and explicit security policies indicates room for maturity in compliance and governance. The domain age and WHOIS data align well with the company's claimed history, supporting legitimacy. Marketing efforts leverage standard analytics and retargeting tools, reflecting a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and content injection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with cookie consent and a privacy policy page. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with opportunities for improvement in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer user data rights information.
  5. Consider integrating automated security scanning and monitoring tools to proactively detect and respond to threats.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IDENTITY – grafické studio & agentura
Description
Pomáhá vybudovat novou korporátní identitu, začíná od loga. Grafické studio a agentura v Pardubicích.
Key services
corporate identity design, logo design, branding, graphic design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, YOOtheme, UIkit
Frameworks
YOOtheme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to graphic design and branding services.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  5. Social media presence is active on Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook.
  6. Uses standard WordPress CMS with common plugins and frameworks.
  7. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the YOOtheme framework and UIkit for UI components. It employs jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features at a basic level. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and JavaScript assets and image optimization evident. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for a small design agency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 2oom.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 2oom.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.