Skip to main content

Security report for 24stops.info

24 Stops · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

24 Stops is a cultural and artistic project focused on guided walks, events, and installations, supported by regional partners such as Fondation Beyeler and others. The website provides information about the project, event registration, and partner links, targeting a general audience interested in culture and art. The technical infrastructure includes common web technologies such as jQuery, Cookiebot for consent management, Google Tag Manager, and Vimeo for video content. The site is hosted behind AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could pose risks. Privacy compliance is good with a visible privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professionally presented with consistent branding and trustworthy partner associations, but could improve in technical security and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 24stops.info

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 24stops.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for 24stops.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the cultural sector with a niche focus on art and guided tours. It leverages partnerships with well-known cultural institutions to enhance credibility and reach. The business model appears to be event-driven with registrations and cultural engagement rather than direct commercial sales. The presence of multiple partner domains indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The website's content and structure support a positive user experience for its target audience. Growth indicators include active event promotion and social media integration. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely include event fees and sponsorships. The partnership ecosystem is strong, enhancing market positioning within the cultural domain.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and integrates a reputable cookie consent management system (Cookiebot), which supports GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.0) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages are found, indicating limited transparency on security governance. Tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used responsibly with consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a cultural project but requires improvements to mitigate common web risks and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and user confidence.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
24 Stops
Description
24 Stops is a cultural project featuring guided walks, events, and artistic objects, presented with partners such as Fondation Beyeler and others. It includes a walking map, gallery, and information about the project.
Key services
Guided walks, Events, Artistic installations, Information and maps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, jQuery Migrate 1.2.1, Slick Carousel, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo embed
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a cultural project with artistic and event content.
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Multiple partner organizations are linked with official URLs.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  6. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  7. Email addresses are present only in mailto links in scripts, not clearly visible in content.
  8. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for tracking and marketing.
  9. Site uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  10. Mobile optimization is basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.11.0, jQuery Migrate, and Slick Carousel for UI components. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, and Google Tag Manager facilitates analytics and marketing tags. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring global content delivery. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization, especially on mobile devices where background images are disabled. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, though no JSON-LD structured data was found. The site lacks modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS indicators, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce risk and improve maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 24stops.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 24stops.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.