Skip to main content

Security report for 21casino.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

21 Casino is an online gambling platform targeting Finnish-speaking users, offering a wide range of casino games including slots, roulette, and blackjack, along with promotional bonuses. The website demonstrates moderate digital maturity with use of modern JavaScript frameworks and integration of multiple analytics and advertising tools. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Security posture is moderate but lacks visible security headers and compliance documentation. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in transparency, compliance, and security to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 21casino.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 21casino.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
36,679
Employees
0
Customers
36,679
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for 21casino.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online gambling sector, targeting adult Finnish users. Its business model relies on offering casino games and bonuses to attract and retain players. The presence of multiple third-party ad networks and tracking services suggests a focus on marketing and user acquisition. Lack of visible company information, contact details, and WHOIS data limits the ability to assess market positioning and partnerships. The site appears to be medium-sized with a professional but basic content presentation.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. The site uses AWS WAF scripts indicating some level of protection, but no detailed security or incident response policies are visible. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface and potential privacy risks. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  3. Add visible contact information including support emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and minimize tracking to reduce privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Nauti yli 3000 huippukolikkopeliste4, Ruletista & Blackjackista 21 Casinolla. Tervetuliaisbonus on valmis!
Key services
online slot games, roulette, blackjack, casino bonuses
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-csp attribute), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, AWS WAF (challenge.js), Webpush SDK
Frameworks
PGX Framework 3.4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AppNexus (adnxs.com), Twitter Ads (ads-twitter.com)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Webpush SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Finnish language online casino platform offering gambling games and bonuses.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts are present, indicating extensive user tracking.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided content.
  6. No explicit security headers or policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools but lacks visible compliance documentation.
  8. Content is targeted at adult users due to gambling services.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected in the content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses PGX Framework 3.4 and AngularJS for frontend rendering, with integrations of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and AWS WAF for security. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and canonical links. Technical debt is moderate due to reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of visible security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 21casino.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 21casino.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.