Skip to main content

Security report for 2046.cz

Jan Mucska · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

2046.cz is a small, specialized service provider offering programming and web design services primarily for artists and non-profit organizations. Founded in 2011 and based in the Czech Republic, the company emphasizes project planning, UI and UX design, and realization of digital solutions. The website serves as a portfolio showcasing various client projects and provides clear contact information for business inquiries. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted by GreenGeeks, and uses modern web fonts and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the site is well-designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but additional security headers and incident response information are absent, suggesting room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the site presents a professional image with moderate risk, suitable for its niche audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 2046.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche market focusing on artists and non-profits, leveraging a service-based model centered on bespoke programming and web design. Its competitive advantage lies in tailored UI/UX expertise and project supervision. The company maintains a portfolio of diverse clients, indicating a stable client base and market presence. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts. The absence of extensive marketing or affiliate programs suggests a focus on organic growth and direct client relationships. The company’s registration and contact details are transparent, enhancing credibility. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident, indicating a lean operational structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party analytics scripts introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small service provider but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response process with dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jan Mucska
Registration number
86555511
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jan Mucska
Description
Project plaing and supervising. Experienced UI and UX design. Realisation.
Key services
programming, web design, project planning, supervising, UI and UX design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, WordPress, LiteSpeed Cache, Open Sans Condensed font, Almendra font
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional portfolio and service site for programming and web design targeting artists and non-profits.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with LiteSpeed Cache and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information available.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  7. Good technical implementation but lacks some security headers and privacy compliance documentation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with LiteSpeed Cache plugin, hosted on GreenGeeks servers. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and visitor tracking respectively. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript techniques. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 2046.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 2046.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.