Skip to main content

Security report for 1a.lv

Attention Required! | Cloudflare · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.1a.lv is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page blocking access. As a result, no actual website content, business information, or contact details are available for analysis. The domain is registered and active with DNS hosted on Cloudflare, but the SSL/TLS configuration is invalid or missing, resulting in no HTTPS support. The DNS records show standard configurations including SPF and DMARC for email protection. The website performance is moderate based on DNS resolution and load time data, but the lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the business or technical maturity. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are found. Overall, the site is currently not usable for end users due to the WAF block, and the trustworthiness and professionalism cannot be evaluated beyond domain legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1a.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF block, no business intelligence data such as company name, market position, services, or target audience could be extracted. The domain is registered in Latvia and uses Cloudflare for DNS and security services. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of publicly accessible content or metadata prevents any meaningful analysis of the business model, competitive advantages, or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture is poor. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS protocols, exposing users to insecure connections if accessed. No HTTP security headers or HSTS policies are implemented. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, and domain protection locks are absent, increasing risk of domain hijacking. The presence of a Cloudflare WAF indicates some level of protection, but the current configuration results in blocking legitimate access. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS deployment, security headers, and domain protection to meet basic security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS with preload and includeSubDomains.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to enhance DNS security.
  5. Activate domain protection locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or changes.
  6. Review and adjust Cloudflare WAF rules to avoid blocking legitimate users and improve user experience.
  7. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and trust.
  8. Provide visible contact information and business details on the website to enhance credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS, CDN, and security services. DNS records are properly configured with multiple A and AAAA records and a valid MX record pointing to Outlook mail protection. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and no TLS protocols are enabled, which is a critical technical deficiency. The site load time is moderate but the page size is zero due to the WAF block. No CMS or frameworks are detected from the HTML content. The site lacks accessibility and SEO optimizations, and no metadata or structured data is present. The use of Cloudflare Insights indicates minimal analytics tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is incomplete and requires significant improvements to enable secure, accessible, and performant web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1a.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1a.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.