Skip to main content

Security report for 18list.top

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 18list.top operates as a minimal adult content listing and search portal primarily monetized through Google advertising networks. The site lacks substantive business information, contact details, or verifiable legitimacy indicators. Its content is adult-oriented, focusing on video clips, streaming HD, and live video chat services, targeting an adults-only audience. The domain is privacy protected and currently offered for sale, which further reduces trust and credibility. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded Google ad scripts but lacks HTTPS and security headers, exposing it to potential security risks. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a basic privacy policy and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, security posture, and business credibility, indicating significant risks for users and partners.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 18list.top

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

18list.top appears to be a small-scale, adult content-related advertising portal with no clear business entity or operational transparency. Its business model relies on ad revenue from Google AdSense and related networks. The lack of contact information, certifications, or security policies suggests a low maturity level and limited market presence. The domain's privacy-protected registration and offer for sale indicate it may be a speculative or transient asset rather than a stable business. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries, and the site does not engage in direct user data collection beyond ad tracking scripts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a weak security posture with no HTTPS detected in the provided data, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The lack of secure forms or input fields reduces attack surface but also indicates minimal user engagement. Privacy compliance is poor, with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The adult content nature of the site increases risk exposure, especially without age verification or content warnings. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception, lacks transparency, and does not follow best security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate immediately to secure user connections.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process including abuse and security contacts.
  5. Enhance content quality and add trust indicators to improve user confidence and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be a generic listing or search portal with embedded ads and related search content focused on terms like Video Clips, Streaming HD, Live Video Chat.
Key services
Related search listings, Advertising display
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google AdSense, Google Ads Partner Scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google Ads Partner
Tracking pixels
Google Ads cookie.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal adult content related listing/search portal
  2. No HTTPS or security headers detected
  3. No contact or business legitimacy information provided
  4. Privacy policy present but basic and no cookie consent
  5. Domain is privacy protected and offered for sale
  6. Advertising heavily reliant on Google ad networks
  7. No social media or verified contact details found
  8. Content safety rated NSFW with high confidence
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with embedded Google advertising scripts for monetization. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal with limited meta tags and no structured data. The domain is hosted on an unknown provider with no visible CDN or performance enhancements. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The site’s simple structure and minimal content suggest low technical complexity but also limited scalability and professionalism.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 18list.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 18list.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.