Skip to main content

Security report for 180marketing.com

180 Marketing · E-commerce · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

180 Marketing is a specialized eCommerce SEO service provider with a mature domain and a strong market position in the eCommerce digital marketing sector. The company offers high ROI SEO services tailored specifically for eCommerce businesses, leveraging extensive industry experience and a focused business model. Their website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand with clear client testimonials, case studies, and recognizable partner logos. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and performance optimizations, including Cloudflare CDN and WP Rocket caching. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some security headers, though improvements such as enabling HSTS and a stronger CSP are recommended. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism present, but GDPR compliance indicators are limited. Overall, the website is credible, well-structured, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 180marketing.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets eCommerce businesses seeking SEO services to improve organic search rankings and ROI. Their competitive advantage lies in their exclusive focus on eCommerce SEO, demonstrated client success, and industry recognition via media features and client testimonials. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through SEO consulting and link acquisition services. The company maintains a small team of experienced SEO professionals and uses digital marketing tools such as ActiveCampaign and Calendly for client engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes Clutch for reputation management and Voiceflow for chat support. Growth indicators include a mature domain age and consistent content updates. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing availability and security. Security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and a report-only Content Security Policy are implemented, though enforcement is not active. No vulnerabilities or subdomain takeover risks were detected. The SPF record is configured to reduce email spoofing risks. However, the absence of HSTS and DNSSEC reduces the overall security posture. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust. Forms use Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA integration, indicating some protection against spam and abuse. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS.
  2. Move Content Security Policy from report-only to enforce mode to mitigate XSS and code injection risks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness and transparency.
  4. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  5. Enhance GDPR compliance by updating privacy policy with explicit data processing details and user rights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery, and various marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Tag Manager and ActiveCampaign. It uses Cloudflare for CDN and DNS, improving performance and security. WP Rocket is used for caching and lazy loading scripts, contributing to fast load times and good performance scores. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No broken links or errors were detected. The site uses external widgets for chat (Voiceflow) and scheduling (Calendly), indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for incremental improvements in security and privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 180marketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 180marketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.