Skip to main content

Security report for 1688.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at 13902997895.1688.com appears to be inaccessible or blocked, with no visible business content or contact information. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating the domain is either unregistered or a placeholder. The site heavily relies on Alibaba-related tracking scripts but lacks any privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. The technical infrastructure shows use of common JavaScript libraries and Alibaba's analytics tools but no CMS or hosting details are evident. Security posture is minimal with no security headers or SSL details confirmed. Overall, the site lacks credibility and appears to be either a placeholder or behind a security mechanism preventing access.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1688.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate 1688.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
95
Registered
95
Resolving
95
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-08-04

Masked preview

  • 16•••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • 16•••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • 19•••.comMediumhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of 1688.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence could be derived due to lack of visible content, company information, or contact details. The domain is not registered or WHOIS data is not available, which is inconsistent with a legitimate business presence. The site appears to be a subdomain under 1688.com, which is Alibaba's B2B platform, but this specific subdomain is not active or publicly accessible.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible security or privacy policies. The site uses Alibaba's tracking and analytics scripts, which are standard but no additional security best practices are evident. The domain's WHOIS data absence raises concerns about legitimacy and potential risk. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found.

Recommendations

  1. Register and properly configure the domain with accurate WHOIS information to establish legitimacy.
  2. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configurations and security headers to improve security posture.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations and build trust.
  4. Provide visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for business credibility.
  5. Ensure website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges to allow proper user and crawler access.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS data unavailable and raw WHOIS output indicates no match; HTML content is minimal and mostly scripts with no visible business content; no privacy, contact, or business info found; likely a blocked or placeholder page possibly behind WAF or security challenge. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AWSC et_f.js, lib-flexible, qrcode.min.js, windvane.js, mtop.js, awsc.js, htmltocanvas.min.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
goldlog, mmstat
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
mmstat, tanx, simba
Tracking pixels
mmstat, goldlog
Marketing tools
goldlog analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly scripts with no visible business or contact information
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or addresses detected
  4. WHOIS data is missing, indicating domain is not registered or WHOIS is blocked
  5. Site likely behind WAF or security challenge page
  6. No business or branding information available
  7. Extensive use of Alibaba/Aliyun related scripts and tracking pixels
  8. No CMS or hosting provider information detected
  9. No social media or external business links found
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses multiple Alibaba-hosted JavaScript libraries for analytics and tracking, including goldlog and mmstat services. The presence of flexible.js indicates some mobile optimization efforts. However, the site lacks visible content and metadata, no CMS or hosting provider is identified, and no SEO or accessibility features are evident. The performance is moderate due to script loading but overall user experience is poor due to lack of content and navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1688.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1688.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.