Skip to main content

Security report for 112interreg.eu

Leadpartner Brand & Redning Sønderjylland · Government · Denmark

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Interreg112 is a bilingual project website supporting the DanGer112 initiative, co-financed by the EU's Interreg 6A program. The project focuses on enhancing cross-border cooperation in emergency services between Denmark and Germany. The website serves as an information portal for project partners, stakeholders, and the public, providing news, events, and contact details. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting government agencies and emergency service organizations in the region. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and accessibility tools like Monsido, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the regional focus, with the registrar being a reputable Danish provider. The site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site has a good baseline with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published privacy policy or incident response information, which are recommended for enhanced security posture and compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with moderate technical sophistication and a solid foundation for security and privacy. Strategic improvements include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms of service documents, adding security headers, and establishing incident response contacts to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 112interreg.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 112interreg.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for 112interreg.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a government-backed cross-border emergency cooperation project funded by the EU Interreg program. Its market positioning is niche, focusing on regional collaboration between Denmark and Germany in emergency preparedness and response. The business model is public sector project funding and collaboration, with no commercial transactions. The target audience includes government agencies, emergency responders, and regional stakeholders. The project benefits from partnerships with multiple regional authorities and emergency organizations, as evidenced by linked partner domains. The site’s content and structure support transparency and stakeholder engagement, which are critical for public trust and project success.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented via Monsido, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, limiting transparency in handling security events. The use of third-party scripts like Monsido and Cludo introduces potential risk vectors, though no vulnerabilities were detected in the current analysis. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but should enhance its security framework to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publish incident response contact information or procedures.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Leadpartner Brand & Redning Sønderjylland
Registration number
35438718
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leadpartner Brand & Redning Sønderjylland
Description
Interreg112 is a project website for DanGer112, co-financed by Interreg 6A EU funds, aiming to strengthen cross-border cooperation in emergency services between Denmark and Germany.
Key services
Project information dissemination, News and event updates, Partner and contact information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4.3.1, js-cookie 2.2.1, Toastify.js, Viewer.js, Monsido (accessibility and consent management), Cludo voice search
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Monsido statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Monsido
Marketing tools
Monsido, Cludo voice search
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a bilingual (Danish/German) project site for an EU-funded cross-border emergency cooperation initiative.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear navigation and relevant project information.
  3. Cookie consent and tracking via Monsido are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with official phone and email.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Use of modern JS libraries and frameworks for UI and accessibility.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4.3.1, and various accessibility and UI enhancement libraries such as Monsido and Viewer.js. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. Hosting is managed via a Danish registrar, team.blue Denmark A/S, consistent with the regional focus. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure or resource loading. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data, though structured data like JSON-LD is absent. The site could benefit from CMS identification and further performance optimization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a government project website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 112interreg.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 112interreg.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.