Skip to main content

Security report for 11.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

11.lv is a prominent Latvian online gambling platform offering a wide range of casino games and sports betting services. The website targets adult users interested in online casino entertainment and live sports betting, positioning itself as a leading player in the Latvian market. The platform features over 3000 casino games, live betting options, and promotional bonuses, catering to a mature audience with a professional and engaging user experience. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking for analytics purposes. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities in the HTML content; however, the absence of explicit security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and security transparency. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the professional presentation and linked partner domains support the site's credibility. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to bolster trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 11.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
55
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online gambling sector, focusing on casino games and sports betting within Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing a digital platform for gambling enthusiasts, monetizing through bets, game play, and promotional offers. The company appears to have a large user base given the extensive game offerings and live betting features. Partnerships with payment and KYC service providers indicate a mature operational ecosystem. The platform's market positioning as a top Latvian online casino suggests competitive advantages in local market knowledge and regulatory compliance. Growth indicators include active live betting events and continuous content updates. The absence of explicit company registration details limits deeper corporate intelligence but the domain and service ecosystem imply a well-established entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No direct evidence of vulnerable libraries or insecure forms was found in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear opportunities for enhancement in policy visibility and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive and easily accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response contact channel.
  4. Enhance transparency by including data protection officer contact details and vulnerability disclosure policies.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Izmēģiniet labāko online kazino Latvijā – 11.lv! Spēlējiet aizraujošas spēles, izbaudiet bonusus, džekpotus un TOP spēļu automātus.
Key services
Online casino games, Sports betting, Live casino, Bonuses and jackpots
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Typekit fonts, PaymentIQ Apple Pay script
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Latvian online casino and sports betting platform.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and targeted at adult gambling users.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  8. Security headers not explicitly visible in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  9. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering for performance optimization. It uses Typekit for fonts and integrates third-party payment scripts such as PaymentIQ for Apple Pay. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations evident in the HTML structure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating a moderate level of user data collection. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the use of CDN and image optimization suggests a focus on performance. The technical implementation is robust, though the absence of some security headers and privacy-related pages indicates areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 11.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 11.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.