Skip to main content

Security report for 028211.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

42/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website content corresponds to a Chrome offline error page featuring the embedded T-Rex runner game. There is no business-related content, contact information, or policy documentation present. The page serves a technical function within the Chrome browser environment rather than representing a commercial or organizational website. The technical infrastructure is based on HTML5, JavaScript, and Canvas APIs, delivering a lightweight and responsive offline game experience. Security posture is basic with no forms or inputs, but lacks explicit security headers or policies. Privacy compliance is minimal due to absence of privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is safe but provides limited business credibility or user engagement features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 028211.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
25
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No identifiable business entity or commercial operations are associated with this domain or content. The domain appears to be used for technical or browser internal purposes, with no market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships evident. The lack of contact or corporate information indicates no active business model or customer engagement. The content targets general users encountering offline browser states, providing a simple game for user experience enhancement.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal but adequate for the page's purpose. No user data is collected, and no forms or external scripts are present, reducing attack surface. However, the absence of security headers and incident response information limits the security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, which is common for non-commercial domains but reduces transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security.
  2. Provide clear privacy and cookie policies even if minimal data is collected to improve compliance.
  3. Include contact or incident response information to support security and user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility metadata to enhance discoverability and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
No business description or company information found. The content is a technical offline error page with embedded game code.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5 Canvas, Web Audio API
Platforms
Chrome Browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms or inputs present
  • No external links or third-party scripts detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The website content is an offline error page with embedded Chrome T-Rex game JavaScript code.
  2. No business, contact, or policy information is present.
  3. No external links, forms, or social media links detected.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No security or incident response information available.
  6. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected; no registrant details available.
  7. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  8. The page is not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Technical implementation is focused on a simple offline game experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, JavaScript, and Canvas for rendering the embedded T-Rex game. The code includes advanced game logic, animation frames, and sound effects using Web Audio API. The page is optimized for mobile and desktop with responsive design considerations. No CMS or third-party frameworks detected. Performance is expected to be fast due to minimal external dependencies. The technical implementation is focused on a single functional offline experience rather than a full website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 028211.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 028211.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.