Skip to main content

Security report for zususeta.lv

Zušu sēta · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zušu sēta is a hospitality business based in Latvia, offering villa accommodation and event hosting services. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality focused on their core services. The business targets general audiences interested in hospitality and leisure. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and the Divi theme, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with structured data implemented. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, though the absence of visible privacy and terms of service policies indicates room for improvement in compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, secure, and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zususeta.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on villa rentals and event hosting, likely targeting local and international tourists. The business model appears to be direct-to-consumer e-commerce with online booking capabilities. The use of WooCommerce suggests transactional capabilities. The market position is not explicitly stated but the professional website and use of modern tools indicate a serious business presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company leverages digital marketing tools and tracking pixels to optimize customer engagement and marketing efforts. Growth indicators and partnerships are not explicitly visible. The lack of detailed contact and compliance information may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder security incident handling. The use of third-party tracking and marketing tools requires careful data protection management. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and compliance documentation to enhance security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page detailing user rights and obligations.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zušu sēta
Description
ZUŠU VILLA ZUŠU KLĒTS
Key services
villa accommodation, event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, WP Booking System Premium
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content.
  6. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Divi theme.
  7. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and tracking.
  8. Structured data (JSON-LD) is present and well-formed.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No incident response or security policy information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress) with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and the Divi theme for design. It uses Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets asynchronously to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Rank Math plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to avoid technical debt and security vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zususeta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zususeta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.