Siguldas saldējums · Hospitality · Latvia
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.
Siguldas saldējums is a small, locally focused ice cream business based in Sigulda, Latvia, specializing in natural ice cream made from fresh Latvian berries, fruits, and dairy. Established in 2014, the company operates a cafe in Sigulda Castle Park and offers masterclasses and STEM educational programs related to ice cream making. The website reflects a strong local brand with excellent customer reviews and a professional digital presence. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks like Next.js, integrates Google Maps and Google Tag Manager, and is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though privacy and cookie policies are missing, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche, but could improve privacy compliance and transparency.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 2 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga_WQ90WYXV96, _ga). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).
What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.
The page loads Google Analytics, but no privacy or cookie policy link was found to name these recipients.
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention siguldassaldejums.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for siguldassaldejums.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with siguldassaldejums.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review siguldassaldejums.lv.