Skip to main content

Security report for zusa.lv

Zusa · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zusa is a Latvian company specializing in forestry services including timber harvesting, sustainable forest management, and the production and sale of various wood products such as firewood, wood briquettes, and pellets. The company operates a professional website built on WordPress, targeting both business and individual customers interested in forestry and wood fuel products. The website presents a clear business model focused on local/regional forestry services and wood product sales. Technically, the site uses common WordPress plugins such as Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking and IP anonymization enabled to enhance privacy. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and safe, but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zusa.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zusa.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for zusa.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zusa operates in the energy sector focusing on forestry and wood fuel products. Its market positioning is local/regional with a small company size. The business model includes timber and forest property acquisition, wood product manufacturing, and equipment services. The company targets both commercial and residential customers seeking sustainable wood fuel solutions. The website content and structure support this positioning with detailed service pages and product offerings. The absence of social media links and limited trust indicators suggest a modest digital marketing footprint. The company appears to maintain direct customer contact via email and phone. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The business intelligence indicates a focused niche player with potential for growth through enhanced digital presence and trust-building measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google Analytics configured for IP anonymization. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site uses popular WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policy transparency, and incident readiness to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish incident response contact information and procedures.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or security badges to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zusa
Description
Mūsu specialitāte ir cirsmu izstrāde un ilgtspējīga meža apsaimniekošana, dažāda veida malkas, koka brikešu un granulu ražošana un tirdzniecība.
Key services
Cirsmu un meža īpašumu iegāde, Mežizstrāde, Koka paletes, Kurināmais (briketes un granulas), Tehnikas pakalpojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.18, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution.
  4. Contact information includes company email and phone number clearly displayed in header.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Cookie policy banner present with consent mechanism.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics configured for IP anonymization.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  10. Website content is professional and relevant to forestry and wood products industry.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.18 with popular plugins including Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing. The site uses minified CSS and JS files for performance optimization and is mobile responsive. The design is professional with good navigation clarity. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not evident. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zusa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zusa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.