Skip to main content

Security report for zpravy.wiki

zprávy.wiki moderný lifestyle magazín · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

zprávy.wiki is a Czech modern lifestyle online magazine focusing on topics such as living, economy, lifestyle, and advice for women. The website operates on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and the Soledad theme, hosted by WEDOS Internet, a.s. The site is relatively new, established in 2023, and targets a general audience interested in lifestyle content. It features multiple content categories and external links to related wiki sites, indicating a networked media presence. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has a good design and navigation structure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zpravy.wiki

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a lifestyle media outlet in the Czech Republic, leveraging a content publishing business model. It appears to be a small-sized operation with no visible parent company or subsidiaries. The site links to numerous partner wiki domains, suggesting a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include advertising and sponsored content, though no explicit monetization details are found. The target customer segment is general lifestyle readers, with a focus on women and home living. The site’s recent domain registration aligns with its new market entry. The partnership with other wiki domains may provide competitive advantages in content sharing and SEO.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present. Forms are standard WordPress search forms without visible advanced security controls. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used, indicating moderate user tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers, DNSSEC, and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
zprávy.wiki moderný lifestyle magazín
Description
MAGAZÍN > BÝVANIE > EKONOMIKA > LIFESTYLE > PRE ŽENY > RADY A NÁVODY
Key services
online lifestyle magazine content, articles on living, economy, lifestyle, advice for women
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Elementor 3.30.3, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Penci Soledad Theme 8.5.8
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech lifestyle magazine with multiple content categories.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Soledad theme.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page.
  5. External links mostly to related wiki domains and social media via shortened URLs.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. DNSSEC not enabled for domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with Elementor and the Soledad theme, leveraging Google Fonts and Google Analytics. Hosting is provided by a reputable Czech registrar, WEDOS Internet, a.s. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with some lazy loading of images. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. The site’s technical infrastructure supports its business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zpravy.wiki. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zpravy.wiki.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.