Skip to main content

Security report for zooundco.de

ZOO & Co. · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZOO & Co. is a German specialty retail business focused on pet supplies and animal food, targeting pet owners with exclusive products for dogs, cats, birds, and other animals. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good design and mobile optimization. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but lacking advanced security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zooundco.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an expert in the pet supplies retail sector in Germany, offering exclusive brands and products. The business model is retail-focused, serving a medium-sized market segment. The website content and branding are consistent, targeting pet owners and animal care consumers. No detailed information on company founding year or parent/subsidiary relationships was found. The lack of visible contact details and certifications limits full business credibility assessment. The presence of social media icons suggests engagement with customers via popular platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness through cookie consent mechanisms but lacks published privacy policies, security policies, and incident response contacts. No security headers or advanced protections were detected in the provided data. The absence of explicit contact information and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates limited readiness for incident handling. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified, but the security score remains moderate due to missing best practices. Compliance with GDPR is partial, mainly through cookie consent but missing comprehensive documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Implement and display terms of service and security policy documents.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS is properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZOO & Co.
Description
Wir sind Experte für Tierbedarf & Tierfutter im Zoofachhandel. Exklusive Produkte & Marken für ✓Hund ✓Katze ✓Vögel ✓uvm.
Key services
Pet supplies, Pet food, Exclusive brands for dogs, cats, birds, and more
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery 3.6.3, Bootstrap 5 (bootstrap.bundle.min.js), CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet.
  5. Social media icons for Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and WhatsApp are present but no direct URLs extracted.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain status as 'connect' with three nameservers, no privacy protection.
  7. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in provided data.
  8. Website content is in German language targeting pet owners in Germany.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content detected.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly identified in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (TYPO3) combined with Bootstrap and jQuery, indicating a standard but solid technical foundation. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags present. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting appears to be with your-server.de based on nameservers. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The site would benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations to improve user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zooundco.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zooundco.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.