Skip to main content

Security report for fashiongo.net

Fashiongo · Retail · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Website hygiene.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fashiongo.net operates as a leading online B2B wholesale marketplace specializing in fashion apparel, shoes, accessories, and home decor. It connects wholesale vendors with retail buyers globally, offering a comprehensive platform for trade shows, promotions, and affiliate programs. The website demonstrates a mature market position with a clear focus on wholesale fashion industry participants. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a robust and scalable digital presence. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements cookie consent mechanisms, and uses encryption libraries, reflecting a strong security posture with room for improvement in public security policy disclosures. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, with no detected blocking or WAF interference, making it accessible and reliable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
59/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set before consent

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (OneTrust), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Google (_gcl_au); TikTok (_ttp, _tt_enable_cookie, ttcsid_CMBFIMBC77UBHLCRHI1G, ttcsid); Google Analytics (_ga_VRTVKM505J, _ga_L1MQ4F0TNM, _ga, _gid); LinkedIn (brwsr); ContentSquare (_cs_c, _cs_id, _cs_s); Facebook (_fbp).

      What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.

    • High

      Tracking continues after "Reject all"

      Guard opened the site in a separate, fresh browser profile, refused consent (OneTrust.RejectAll()) as a visitor would, then reloaded the page. These analytics or marketing cookies were set after the refusal: Google (_gcl_au); Google Analytics (_ga_VRTVKM505J, _ga_L1MQ4F0TNM, _ga, _gid); LinkedIn (brwsr); TikTok (_ttp, _tt_enable_cookie, ttcsid, ttcsid_CMBFIMBC77UBHLCRHI1G); ContentSquare (_cs_c, _cs_id, _cs_s); Facebook (_fbp) and 1 more. Requests also went to Google (www.google.com); Google An…

      What to do: Tie every tag to its consent category in the consent platform or tag manager so it stays blocked after a refusal, then repeat the check: reject, reload, and confirm no analytics or marketing cookies appear.

  2. Website hygiene

    Outdated scripts and CMS versions are how most small-business sites get compromised; a security.txt file tells researchers where to report what they find.

    • High

      Outdated JavaScript library with known vulnerabilities

      axios 0.15.2 (loaded from https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/axios/0.15.2/axios.js) has 26 published vulnerabilities: CVE-2019-10742, GHSA-42xw-2xvc-qx8m, CVE-2020-28168, GHSA-4w2v-q235-vp99, CVE-2021-3749, GHSA-cph5-m8f7-6c5x and 44 more.

      What to do: Upgrade axios to 1.6.8 or later and retest the pages that use it.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fashiongo.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
70
GDPR outside view
59
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fashiongo holds a strong market position as the number one online wholesale fashion marketplace, targeting wholesale vendors and retail buyers. Its business model is centered on facilitating B2B transactions in the fashion sector, supported by services like online trade shows and buyer referral affiliate programs. The company leverages partnerships and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and growth. The platform's extensive product categories and promotional campaigns indicate a broad and diversified revenue stream. The absence of privacy protection in WHOIS data and consistent registrant information enhance its credibility. The company operates primarily in the retail and e-commerce sectors within the United States, catering to a large enterprise scale.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, including Strict-Transport-Security and Content-Security-Policy. The use of encryption libraries in client-side scripts and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism demonstrate adherence to security best practices. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The integration of multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced disclosure and formal vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fashiongo
Description
FASHIONGO is the No.1 Online business-to-business (B2B) fashion marketplace, efficiently connecting wholesale vendors and retail buyers from around the world. With Fashiongo, buyers can discover new ways to grow their businesses!
Key services
Wholesale clothing, Shoes, Accessories, Home decor, Online trade shows, Buyer referral affiliate program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, jQuery, Axios, Moment.js, Cropper.js, GSAP, Slick Carousel, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
AWS (implied by URLs and hosting)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries with async loading
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of encryption libraries (AES, RSA) in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, Facebook Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Pinterest Analytics, Contentsquare
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok Pixel, Pinterest Tag, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Heap Analytics, Impact Universal Tracking
Marketing tools
Heap Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B wholesale fashion marketplace.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Extensive use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in the HTML content.
  6. Strong branding and consistent navigation structure.
  7. Multiple external tracking and advertising services integrated.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Vue.js for reactive UI, jQuery for legacy support, and Axios for HTTP requests. It uses popular libraries such as Moment.js for date handling, Cropper.js for image manipulation, and GSAP for animations. Hosting on AWS provides scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools. SEO is well supported with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility could be improved. The site employs cookie consent via OneTrust, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks include dependency on numerous third-party scripts which require vigilant security management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fashiongo.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fashiongo.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.