Skip to main content

Security report for zoomcom.tv

Zoom Communications · Media · India

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zoom Communications is a well-established broadcast services company specializing in outside broadcast solutions, flypacks, OB trucks, system integration, and content creation primarily serving the South Asian and Southeast Asian markets. The company has a strong market position with deployments in over 21 countries and notable involvement in major sporting events such as the Indian Premier League and Commonwealth Games. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 5 and Owl Carousel, with some legacy jQuery usage. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS or security headers explicitly confirmed, and no forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection for domain registration, which is common for media companies but reduces transparency. The website lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Contact information is clearly provided, including a company email and phone number, and a verified YouTube channel link enhances trust. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with moderate technical and security maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zoomcom.tv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zoom Communications operates in the media and telecommunications sector, focusing on broadcast technology and live event production services. Their competitive advantage lies in pioneering flypacks and OB trucks in India and Southeast Asia, with a strong portfolio of high-profile clients and events. The business model is service-oriented, targeting broadcasters, event organizers, and media production companies. Revenue streams likely include equipment rental, system integration projects, and content production services. The company demonstrates growth through international deployments and sustained partnerships with major sports leagues. The partnership ecosystem includes broadcasters and technology providers, though no explicit partner domains were identified. The website content and client references indicate a mature and reputable market presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website does not expose sensitive data or have forms that collect personal information, which reduces attack surface. However, no security headers were detected, and HTTPS status is unknown, which are areas of concern. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of outdated jQuery version could pose potential vulnerabilities if exploited. Overall, the security culture appears basic with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security and ensure all site resources load securely.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Upgrade legacy JavaScript libraries and improve accessibility features to enhance security and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zoom Communications
Description
Zoom Communications is South Asia’s first and Southeast Asia’s leading Outside Broadcast Company, specializing in live coverage of sports, entertainment, and news events. They provide flypacks, OB trucks, system integration, content creation, and integrated media services with a presence in over 21 countries.
Key services
Outside Broadcast, Flypacks, OB Trucks, System Integration, Content Creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap 5.3.8, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts (League Gothic, Open Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data
  • Video modal uses controls and event handlers to manage playback

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. No visible forms collecting user data
  4. Contact info clearly displayed in footer
  5. No security.txt or incident response info present
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  8. Modern frontend technologies used but some libraries are outdated (jQuery 2.1.1)
  9. Good mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 5 and Owl Carousel for responsive design and interactive elements. Google Fonts are used for typography. jQuery 2.1.1 is outdated and should be updated to reduce security risks. The site includes video content with modal playback controls implemented via JavaScript. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the HTML source. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks Open Graph or structured data markup. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML but could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zoomcom.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zoomcom.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.