Skip to main content

Security report for zookepas.lv

SIA PETAFFINITES · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA PETAFFINITES operates the website www.zookepas.lv, a Latvian veterinary pharmacy and pet supplies e-commerce platform offering quality pet food and care products from brands such as GranataPet, Virbac, and Buddy. The business targets pet owners in Latvia, providing online shopping with delivery options and physical store presence. The website demonstrates a consistent brand image and good content quality tailored to its niche market. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Ecwid for e-commerce, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics, and employs service workers for progressive web app capabilities. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though some security headers are missing and no vulnerability disclosure is present. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed GDPR indicators. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zookepas.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized retailer in the Latvian pet care market, leveraging well-known pet food brands to attract customers. Its business model combines online sales with physical store services, enhancing customer reach. The presence of customer testimonials and official registry links adds trustworthiness. Marketing efforts include standard analytics and retargeting tools. The company appears small-sized with focused sector involvement in retail and e-commerce. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified. The website content and WHOIS data align well, supporting legitimacy and operational transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses service workers, indicating a modern approach to security and performance. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page was found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent banner detected, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing missing headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content Security Policy (CSP) header to reduce XSS risks.
  2. Add security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA PETAFFINITES
Description
Veterinārā aptieka un zooveikals Zooķepas piedāvā kvalitatīvu dzīvnieku barību un papildbarību no zīmoliem GranataPet, Virbac, Buddy, kā arī kopšanas līdzekļus un zoopreces suņiem, kaķiem, grauzējiem un putniem.
Key services
Dzīvnieku barība un papildbarība, Kopšanas līdzekļi dzīvniekiem, Veterinārā aptieka un konsultācijas, Interneta veikals ar piegādi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Ecwid e-commerce platform, Skrollr.js, Service Worker, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Ecwid Storefront
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian pet food and veterinary product retailer with an online store.
  2. Content is in Latvian language and well structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  4. Uses common analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented including phone and email.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site fully accessible.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Ecwid e-commerce platform scripts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. It registers a service worker for offline support and performance improvements. The HTML structure is well-formed with meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter Cards, JSON-LD). The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with prefetching of scripts and lazy loading of images. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting appears to be via a CDN (Cloudfront), enhancing availability and speed. There is no explicit CMS detected, suggesting a custom or Ecwid-managed site. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small to medium e-commerce business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zookepas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zookepas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.