Skip to main content

Security report for zolar.com

Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website zolar.com presents itself as a service platform focused on optimizing photovoltaic (PV) installations, targeting installers and professionals in the energy sector primarily in Germany. The site offers services including planning, installation, and customer acquisition support for PV installers. The business appears to be established, with a domain age dating back to 2002, consistent with a mature company in the energy industry. The website is built using Framer CMS and hosted with AWS DNS services, incorporating Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The design and user experience are good, with mobile optimization and clear navigation, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No explicit contact information or incident response details are found on the site. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zolar.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zolar.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for zolar.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zolar operates in the energy sector, specifically focusing on photovoltaic installation services. Its business model revolves around providing a centralized platform for installers to plan, execute, and grow their customer base. The company targets professional installers and likely operates primarily in Germany, as indicated by language and registrar data. The domain's longevity suggests stability and market presence. The use of modern web technologies and analytics indicates a digitally mature operation. However, the lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or detailed contact information may limit perceived credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could leave DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms, potentially impacting privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Optimiere deine PV-Installationen mit den zolar Installer Services. Alles an einem Ort: Planen, installieren und neue Kunden gewinnen.
Key services
Planning PV installations, Installation services, Customer acquisition for installers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Framer (site generator), AWS DNS (Amazon Route 53)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in German and focused on PV installation services.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
  8. Website uses Framer as CMS and AWS for DNS hosting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer CMS, a modern design and prototyping platform, and is hosted with Amazon Web Services DNS infrastructure. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking, loaded asynchronously for performance. The site includes extensive font loading from Google Fonts and custom fonts hosted on Framer's CDN. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. No CMS-specific security plugins or frameworks are detected. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC are technical risks. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zolar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zolar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.