Skip to main content

Security report for zmlly.com

博雅特产网 · Retail · China

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

博雅特产网是一家专注于中国各地土特产、特产礼盒及相关旅游文化内容的综合信息平台。网站内容丰富，涵盖特产介绍、旅游景点推荐及民俗文化分享，定位于中国国内消费者及特产批发商，市场定位为中国最大的特产信息网站之一。技术上，网站采用了jQuery、Bootstrap和Font Awesome等成熟前端技术，具备良好的移动端适配和用户体验，但缺乏现代安全配置和隐私合规措施。安全方面，网站未启用DNSSEC，缺少安全HTTP头，且无隐私政策或Cookie政策，存在合规风险。整体风险中等，建议加强安全配置和合规建设以提升信任度和用户保护。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zmlly.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

博雅特产网通过内容聚合和信息展示的商业模式，主要服务于特产消费者和批发商，提供丰富的产品介绍和旅游文化内容。网站通过友情链接构建合作伙伴网络，增强内容丰富度和访问量。作为新成立的业务，网站尚未展示明确的联系方式或法律合规文件，表明其业务仍处于发展初期。市场竞争中，凭借内容广泛和地域覆盖优势，具备一定的竞争力，但需完善合规和安全措施以提升商业信誉和用户信任。

Security posture

当前安全成熟度较低，缺少关键安全HTTP头和DNSSEC支持，未见HTTPS配置细节，且无隐私或安全政策披露。网站未提供安全事件响应渠道，缺乏漏洞披露机制，存在潜在的合规和安全风险。建议尽快实施HTTPS强制、配置安全头、启用DNSSEC，并发布隐私及安全政策，建立安全事件响应流程以提升整体安全水平和合规性。

Recommendations

  1. 启用并强制HTTPS，确保数据传输安全。
  2. 配置安全HTTP头，如Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options和X-Content-Type-Options。
  3. 启用DNSSEC以防止DNS欺骗攻击。
  4. 发布隐私政策和Cookie政策，明确数据收集和使用，提升合规性。
  5. 建立安全事件响应和漏洞披露机制，增强安全文化和用户信任。
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
博雅特产网
Description
博雅特产网是中国最大的特产网站，主要提供全国各地特产、土特产、特产礼盒、名优特产、农产品、水果、美食、特色小吃、副食品、工艺品等特产批发及全国旅游攻略、旅游景点推荐及全国各地方的民俗文化知识分享。
Key services
特产信息发布, 特产批发信息, 旅游景点推荐, 民俗文化知识分享
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Swiper
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese about local specialty products and tourism.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  4. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  5. Use of common web technologies like jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome.
  6. External links mostly to related Chinese content and partner sites.
  7. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and domain status flags enhance domain security.
Technical notes

Notes

网站采用传统前端技术栈，使用jQuery、Bootstrap和Font Awesome，页面结构清晰，移动端适配良好。性能表现中等，未见明显技术债务。缺少现代安全配置和合规文件，存在技术升级和安全加固空间。建议引入现代前端框架和自动化安全扫描工具，提升技术现代化水平和安全防护能力。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zmlly.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zmlly.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.