Skip to main content

Security report for zlm.lv

ZLM · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZLM is a Latvian company specializing in forest and land management services, offering valuation, inventory, sales, and consulting primarily to forest landowners. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with over 2500 successful collaborations, emphasizing efficient service and immediate payments. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring interactive tools such as a forest valuation calculator and multiple contact forms with validation. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is indicated by a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page, though terms of service and incident response policies are not evident. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-suited for its target audience, though improvements in security headers and WHOIS transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zlm.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZLM operates in the forestry and real estate sectors in Latvia, targeting forest owners and sellers. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive forest management services, including valuation, inventory, and sales facilitation. The company leverages digital tools to streamline customer interactions and enhance service delivery. With a solid market presence indicated by numerous successful collaborations and FSC certification, ZLM maintains a professional online presence supported by social media channels. Partnerships with service providers like born.lv for website development indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on regional forestry markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form validation practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy concerns, mitigated partially by cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, indicating room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and enhance security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish detailed security and incident response policies to improve transparency and compliance with data protection regulations.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Increase WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details on the website to bolster trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZLM
Description
ZLM provides forest and land management services including forest valuation, inventory, sales, and consulting. They emphasize efficient management, immediate payments, and honest property valuation.
Key services
Forest management, Forest inventory, Land and property acquisition, Forest valuation, Consulting and documentation support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Bootstrap, Redux Framework, Ninja Forms, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Adform Tracking
Frameworks
Elementor, Redux, Ninja Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of form validation and consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Adform Tracking
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Adform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder
  3. Includes a forest valuation calculator and contact forms with validation
  4. Has cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain registration analysis
  8. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  9. Business focuses on forestry services in Latvia
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Adform tracking. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with deferred loading and caching mechanisms. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional with moderate performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zlm.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zlm.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.