Skip to main content

Security report for abtimber.lv

AB Timber · Real Estate · Latvia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA AB Timber is a Latvian company specializing in forestry and arboriculture services with over 18 years of experience. Their offerings include certified forest inventory, tree measurement, arborist services, real estate transactions, and legal consulting. The company targets forest owners, landowners, and clients requiring professional forestry and tree care services within Latvia. The website reflects a well-established local business with certified professionals and a comprehensive service portfolio. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Kadence WP theme and WPForms Lite plugin, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices like structured data and meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no major technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and employs standard form protections but lacks explicit security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers and policies. The website is safe for general audiences, contains no adult or questionable content, and presents trustworthy business information consistent with domain registration data. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and publishing a security policy or incident response contact to enhance compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
85/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
62/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      The page loads WordPress Stats, but no privacy or cookie policy link was found to name these recipients.

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abtimber.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
89
DNS health
93
Network security
85
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
62
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abtimber.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for abtimber.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AB Timber operates in the forestry and real estate sectors in Latvia, providing a niche set of services including forest inventory, arboriculture, and legal consulting related to land and forestry assets. Their competitive advantage lies in certified expertise and a broad service range from technical forest measurements to real estate transactions. The business model is service-oriented, targeting landowners and forestry stakeholders. The company appears to be a small but established player with a local market focus. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers like Kadence WP and Call Now Button but no explicit business partners are listed. Growth indicators include a long operational history and diversified service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and form inputs are protected by WPForms validation. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security culture appears minimal but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff to foster a stronger security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AB Timber
Description
SIA “AB Timber” provides forestry services including certified forest inventory, tree measurement, independent wood measurement, arborist services, real estate transactions, and legal consultations with over 18 years of experience.
Key services
Forest inventory and taksation, Tree measurement and valuation, Arborist and dendrology services, Real estate transactions and legal consulting, Documentation and consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.1.4, jQuery 3.7.1, Kadence WP Theme, WPForms Lite plugin, Bootstrap, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA in forms (implied by WPForms)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Site Kit (likely Google Analytics)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on forestry and arboriculture services with clear business information.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is present but no email addresses explicitly listed on the site.
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
  8. Good SEO and structured data usage.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Kadence WP theme and WPForms Lite plugin, supported by jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented. However, the absence of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abtimber.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abtimber.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.