Skip to main content

Security report for zimpel.de

news aktuell · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zimpel.de is a German PR software and media database platform operated as a product of news aktuell, a subsidiary of the German Press Agency (dpa). The website targets PR professionals and media relations specialists by providing tools for managing journalist contacts and media distribution lists. The business model is SaaS-oriented, focusing on the media and public relations sector within Germany. The site content is minimal and primarily driven by JavaScript, with no visible contact or policy pages on the main HTML content. Technically, the site uses nginx as the web server and employs modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) with a valid SSL certificate. DNS hosting is managed by Colt, and email services are routed through news aktuell mail servers. Security headers are present but some are misconfigured or only in report-only mode, such as the Content Security Policy and X-XSS-Protection header. No DMARC record is configured, which is a gap in email security. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating low privacy compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture but lacks transparency and completeness in privacy and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zimpel.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zimpel.de operates under news aktuell, a well-established media company in Germany, positioning itself as a specialized PR software provider. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its integration with the dpa network and focus on media contacts. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting PR professionals and media agencies. The lack of visible contact information and policy documents on the main page may limit trust and user engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes news aktuell and related mail infrastructure. Growth indicators are not visible from the site content. The platform uses modern web technologies but could improve transparency and user trust by publishing comprehensive policies and contact details.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with modern TLS protocols and a valid certificate, which is a strong baseline. Security headers such as X-Frame-Options, Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy are present, enhancing protection against common web attacks. However, the X-XSS-Protection header is disabled, and the Content Security Policy is only in report-only mode, reducing effectiveness. The absence of DMARC records weakens email security posture. No known SSL vulnerabilities or weak cipher suites were detected. Cookies are set with secure and HttpOnly flags, which is good practice. The site uses Bugsnag for error tracking, indicating some level of operational monitoring. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by enforcing CSP, enabling XSS protection, and adding DMARC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce Content Security Policy instead of report-only mode to mitigate XSS risks.
  2. Enable X-XSS-Protection header or remove it if not supported to avoid confusion.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add DMARC DNS record to protect against email spoofing and phishing.
  5. Provide visible contact information and incident response contacts to enhance transparency and security readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is served by nginx and uses modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) with a valid SSL certificate expiring in 86 days. DNS is hosted on Colt's network with MX records pointing to news aktuell mail servers. The site loads CSS and JavaScript assets with preload hints, indicating some performance optimization. The HTML content is minimal and relies on JavaScript for rendering, which may impact SEO and accessibility. No CMS or frameworks are explicitly detected from the HTML. Bugsnag is used for error tracking. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, but mobile optimization and accessibility could not be assessed from the provided data. Security headers are mostly present but some require configuration improvements. No structured data or social media links are embedded in the HTML, limiting SEO richness and social engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zimpel.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zimpel.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.