Skip to main content

Security report for zgi.lv

ZGI Capital SIA · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZGI Capital SIA is a Latvian alternative investment fund manager specializing in growth capital investments for established companies expanding their market reach and operational capacity. The company has a 20-year track record managing multiple fund generations and supporting diverse sectors including manufacturing, technology, and energy. Their website presents a professional image with detailed portfolio information and contact options, targeting medium-sized enterprises seeking investment. Technically, the site uses Mozello CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and CDN hosting, offering good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and form validation but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is credible and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zgi.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZGI Capital occupies a strong niche in the Baltic private equity market with a focus on growth-stage investments. Their competitive advantage lies in long-term experience, diversified sector exposure, and recognized industry awards. The business model centers on managing alternative investment funds and providing capital plus strategic support to portfolio companies. Revenue streams likely derive from fund management fees and investment returns. Target customers are established Latvian companies with export ambitions. The company demonstrates growth through multiple fund generations and successful exits. The partnership ecosystem includes portfolio companies across various industries. Strategic observations include the need to improve digital privacy compliance and security posture to align with evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and client-side form validation. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No evidence of published security policies or incident response contacts reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears basic but could be enhanced by publishing security documentation and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure advanced security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Ensure server-side validation of all form inputs to complement client-side checks and prevent injection attacks.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain a secure technology stack.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ZGI Capital SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZGI Capital SIA
Description
ZGI Capital provides growth investments and development financing to established companies expanding into new export markets, increasing capacity, developing new business directions, improving profitability, or automating processes. They manage alternative investment funds registered with the Latvian Bank and have a 20-year history of supporting companies across various sectors.
Key services
Growth capital investments, Alternative investment fund management, Business development support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mozello CMS (inferred from scripts and URLs), Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Mozello website builder platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Form validation with client-side checks
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-740650377)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about investment funds and portfolio companies.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and a contact form.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  6. Uses modern CDN and analytics tools but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. No social media links detected on the site.
  8. Forms have client-side validation but no visible server-side validation info.
  9. Website is mobile optimized and uses a professional CMS platform.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox 3 for UI components, hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN for performance. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for traffic and conversion tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and smooth scrolling features. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts and CDNs. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by canonical tags and meta viewport settings. Technical risks include outdated jQuery version and missing advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize JavaScript libraries and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zgi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zgi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.