Skip to main content

Security report for zentrumsverein.at

Innsbrucker Zentrumsverein · Retail · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Innsbrucker Zentrumsverein is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting the historic city center of Innsbruck, Austria. It focuses on enhancing the shopping experience, organizing events and markets, and supporting local businesses and cultural initiatives. The website reflects a well-structured and professionally designed platform targeting both locals and tourists interested in the Innsbruck city center. Technically, the site runs on Microsoft IIS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates third-party services such as Google Analytics and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. The SSL configuration is adequate but could be improved by enabling full HSTS and OCSP stapling. Security headers are present, and no critical vulnerabilities were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR-aligned consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of business credibility, technical implementation, and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zentrumsverein.at

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong regional position as a promoter of Innsbruck's city center, leveraging partnerships with local event sites and tourism platforms. Its business model is community and event-driven, focusing on enhancing visitor engagement and supporting retail and hospitality sectors. The website's integration with social media and newsletter services indicates active marketing efforts. The partnership with Zeppelin Group for marketing and production further strengthens its digital presence. The target audience includes local residents, tourists, and businesses within Innsbruck. The site content and linked domains suggest a collaborative ecosystem supporting city center vitality.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, though it is nearing expiry and should be renewed promptly. Security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-XSS-Protection are implemented, enhancing protection against common web attacks. However, HSTS is not fully enabled, and OCSP stapling is absent, which are areas for improvement. DNSSEC and DMARC are not configured, representing potential gaps in DNS and email security. No evidence of incident response policies or vulnerability disclosure programs was found. The use of Usercentrics for cookie consent indicates attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable full HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate validation performance and security.
  3. Configure DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  4. Add a DMARC record to enhance email security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Review and phase out support for TLS 1.1 due to obsolescence and security concerns.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Innsbrucker Zentrumsverein
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft IIS 8.5 and uses a combination of JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Usercentrics for cookie management. It integrates Google Analytics for tracking and social media SDKs for Facebook and Twitter. The site uses schema.org JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. Performance data was not available, but the site appears optimized for mobile devices with responsive design elements. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears to be a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting DNS is managed by joker.com. The site uses multiple external resources hosted on cloud.zeppelin-group.com and other partner domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance monitoring and further accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zentrumsverein.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zentrumsverein.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.