Skip to main content

Security report for zentiva.de

Zentiva · Healthcare · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zentiva operates as a pharmaceutical company specializing in generic medicines and healthcare products primarily serving the German market. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting healthcare professionals, pharmacies, and consumers. The company positions itself as an established player in the generic pharmaceuticals sector with a comprehensive product database and customer service offerings. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The hosting and DNS setup via UltraDNS nameservers suggests a reliable hosting environment. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses security tokens in cookies to prevent CSRF attacks, but lacks explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response contact, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is accessible, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations, with moderate tracking and advertising practices primarily through Google and Facebook. The domain WHOIS data aligns with the website content, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zentiva.de

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zentiva.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for zentiva.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zentiva's market positioning as a generic pharmaceutical provider in Germany is supported by its detailed product offerings and service sections. The business model focuses on manufacturing and distributing generic medicines, targeting healthcare providers and end consumers. The website's navigation and content structure facilitate easy access to product databases, career opportunities, and company information, indicating a customer-centric approach. The use of Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager reflects compliance with European privacy laws and a data-driven marketing strategy. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found, suggesting contact is primarily via web forms. The absence of visible certifications or security policies may indicate areas for strategic enhancement to build further trust. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand identity and a professional online presence, supporting its competitive advantage in the healthcare sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and anti-CSRF tokens in cookies. The presence of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot indicates strong privacy compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK introduces potential tracking and privacy considerations but is managed through consent. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in header implementation and transparency around security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust with security researchers.
  4. Consider providing direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries to enhance credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize unnecessary data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zentiva
Description
Zentiva is a pharmaceutical company offering a wide range of generic medicines and healthcare products, targeting healthcare professionals and consumers in Germany.
Key services
Generic medicines, Product database, Customer service and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • Use of security tokens in cookies (e.g., __RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found beyond cookie and privacy policy.
  4. No direct email or phone contact information found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found; recommend adding for transparency.
  8. Website content is professional and targeted at healthcare sector.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries such as Modernizr for feature detection and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integration. Cookiebot is employed for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, reflecting a mature approach to privacy. The hosting infrastructure is supported by UltraDNS nameservers, indicating a stable DNS setup. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present, enhancing usability. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags included but minimal descriptive content. No CMS or backend platform was explicitly detected from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly website experience with opportunities for performance and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zentiva.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zentiva.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.