Skip to main content

Security report for zentiva.com

Zentiva · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zentiva is a healthcare-focused pharmaceutical company with a professional online presence. The website demonstrates a commitment to privacy compliance through a comprehensive cookie policy and consent mechanism. The technical infrastructure includes modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital marketing and analytics setup. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and explicit incident response policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data and contact information slightly reduces overall trustworthiness but does not negate the professional appearance and compliance efforts. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and providing clear contact channels for security and business inquiries.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zentiva.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zentiva.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zentiva operates in the pharmaceutical sector, targeting healthcare professionals and patients. The business model centers on pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution, positioning itself as an established player in healthcare. The website content is consistent and professional, supporting a large enterprise scale. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain data. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap in transparency but may be due to privacy protection or technical issues.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a good baseline security posture. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a weakness that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which limits the ability to assess readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zentiva
Description
Zentiva is a healthcare company focused on pharmaceutical products and services.
Key services
Pharmaceutical manufacturing, Healthcare solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Modernizr, Select2, Roboto font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Fliphtml5, Elfsight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a corporate domain.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content provided.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. Website content is professional and targeted to healthcare sector.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and the site uses Modernizr and Select2 libraries. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO meta tags, though some metadata fields like description and Open Graph descriptions are empty or minimal. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from improved SEO metadata completeness and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zentiva.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zentiva.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.