Skip to main content

Security report for zenain.sk

Media · Slovakia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ŽENA in is a Slovak media website focused on providing lifestyle advice, horoscopes, health tips, and interesting content primarily targeted at women. The site operates on a WordPress platform with a modern Newspaper theme and uses common plugins for newsletter and content management. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance with good mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure login forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website serves a niche media role with a focus on content publishing for a Slovak-speaking female audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zenain.sk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche media outlet targeting women interested in lifestyle, health, and horoscopes. It leverages content publishing as its business model, likely monetized through advertising and partnerships. The site shows consistent branding and a clear content focus but lacks explicit business contact information and formal policies, which may limit trust for some users. The external links suggest a broad network of related media and informational sites, indicating a partnership or content syndication ecosystem. The domain age and registration details align well with the business profile, indicating a legitimate and stable operation.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS and has secure login forms, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, and no advanced anti-bot or CAPTCHA mechanisms are detected on login forms. The use of up-to-date WordPress and plugins is assumed but should be verified regularly. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional hardening and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add explicit privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Include clear contact information for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Enhance login security with CAPTCHA or rate limiting to prevent brute force attacks.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
ŽENA in is a website providing advice and content focused on women, including categories such as interesting facts, horoscopes, tips, health, and lifestyle.
Key services
articles on lifestyle, horoscopes, health advice, tips and tricks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, td-composer plugin, td-newsletter plugin, td-cloud-library plugin, td-standard-pack plugin, Newspaper theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login modal with password fields
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based media site focused on women's lifestyle and advice.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  4. Social media links are present but mostly link to external unrelated domains, possibly partners or references.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security warnings.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Login form present but no CAPTCHA or advanced security measures visible.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a popular Newspaper theme and several plugins for newsletter and content management. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting appears to be provided by svethostingu.cz/eu, a Czech/Slovak hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern web fonts from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic, and SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zenain.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zenain.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.