Skip to main content

Security report for zemspol-studenka.cz

Zemspol Studénka a. s. · Energy · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zemspol Studénka a.s. is a medium-sized Czech company specializing in agricultural production and energy generation through biogas plants. The company operates biogas stations, produces animal feed, cultivates oilseeds, cereals, and medicinal plants, and is a leading milk supplier in its region. The website reflects a professional presence with clear business descriptions and contact information, targeting stakeholders in agriculture and energy sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Yoast SEO Premium plugin, indicating a modern CMS infrastructure with SEO considerations. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting and domain registration are consistent and long-standing, supporting business credibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zemspol-studenka.cz

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a regional leader in milk production and biogas energy generation. Its business model integrates plant and animal production with renewable energy, creating diversified revenue streams. The company manages a significant land area and livestock population, indicating operational scale. The presence of a Facebook page suggests engagement with customers and stakeholders. The website content and structured data reinforce the company's legitimacy and focus. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned, but the domain registration and hosting align with the company's profile.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no GDPR-related disclosures or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Zemspol Studénka a. s.
VAT number
CZ09108645
Registration number
09108645
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zemspol Studénka a. s.
Description
Zemspol Studénka - Provozujeme bioplynovou stanici. Vyrábíme krmiva. Pěstujeme olejniny, obiloviny, léčivé rostliny. Produkujeme mléko.
Key services
Biogas station operation, Feed production, Cultivation of oilseeds, cereals, medicinal plants, Milk production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Fusion Builder
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data.
  5. Use of modern WordPress theme and SEO plugin indicates some digital maturity.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and theme scripts.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and consistent with the business sector.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Avada theme and Yoast SEO Premium plugin, indicating a mature and SEO-optimized platform. The tech stack includes jQuery and custom Fusion Builder scripts. Hosting appears stable with REG-GRANSY as registrar and DNS provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. No analytics or tracking services beyond standard WordPress scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, representing areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zemspol-studenka.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zemspol-studenka.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.