Skip to main content

Security report for zedra.com

ZEDRA · Finance · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZEDRA is a global financial services provider specializing in Corporate & Global Expansion, Active Wealth, Pensions & Incentives, and Fund solutions. The company targets wealthy families, entrepreneurs, corporations, funds, and pension schemes, offering tailored planning, governance, and operational services. Their market position is strong with multiple international locations and strategic investments, reflecting a large enterprise with a comprehensive service portfolio. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Gravity Forms for data collection, Wistia for video embedding, and Cloudflare for security and performance. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, including a robust accessibility plugin offering multiple user profiles and adjustments. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and uses Cloudflare's protection mechanisms. Forms are secured with honeypot fields and consent checkboxes, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure digital presence. The business credibility is supported by consistent branding, comprehensive content, and active social media engagement. No critical security issues were found, and the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy and incident response page, continuous monitoring of third-party scripts, and maintaining up-to-date software to sustain security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zedra.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZEDRA operates in the finance sector, providing essential services in wealth management, corporate expansion, pensions, and fund administration. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored, scalable solutions to high-net-worth individuals, families, corporations, and institutional clients globally. The company leverages a broad geographic footprint with offices in multiple countries, enhancing its market reach and client service capabilities. Strategic investments, such as the acquisition of Alan & Luca, indicate growth and diversification. The website's content and structure reflect a mature, professional organization with a strong emphasis on compliance, governance, and client-centric services.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and use of Cloudflare for DDoS and bot mitigation. Forms incorporate anti-spam measures like honeypots and require explicit user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. No signs of exposed credentials, malware, or SQL injection vulnerabilities were found. The presence of security plugins such as Wordfence suggests active security management. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response page indicates an area for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively, minimizing risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  2. Implement explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or equivalent anti-bot mechanisms beyond honeypots.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring and compliance checks to uphold GDPR and other regulatory requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZEDRA
Description
A global powerhouse providing Corporate & Global Expansion, Active Wealth, Pension & Incentive services and Fund solutions
Key services
Active Wealth, Corporate & Global Expansion, Pensions & Incentives, Fund Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Wistia (video embedding), Cloudflare (CDN and security), WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent, OneTap Accessibility Plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare for DDoS and bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Wordfence detected)
  • Secure forms with honeypot and consent checkboxes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads, YouTube, Vimeo
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, YouTube, Vimeo, Wistia
Marketing tools
Campaign Tracker, ClickDimensions
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. Multiple contact forms with proper data collection and consent
  4. Strong accessibility features implemented via OneTap plugin
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  6. Active social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube
  7. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities detected in HTML content
  8. Use of Cloudflare for security and performance
  9. Professional and consistent branding and content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing modern technologies including jQuery, Gravity Forms for advanced form handling, and Wistia for video content delivery. Cloudflare is employed for CDN and security services, enhancing performance and protection. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile responsiveness, and strong accessibility features powered by the OneTap plugin, supporting multiple languages and user profiles. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained, modern infrastructure with opportunities to further enhance security transparency and incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zedra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zedra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.