Pivovar Svijany · Hospitality · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.
Zámek Svijany is a heritage tourism and hospitality website representing a historic castle near Český ráj, Czech Republic, owned and restored by the Pivovar Svijany brewery. The site offers cultural exhibitions, castle tours, event hosting, and promotes the brewery's traditional beer products. The website is professionally designed with good navigation, mobile optimization, and content relevance, targeting tourists, event attendees, and beer enthusiasts. Technically, the website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and lightbox galleries. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. The site uses CAPTCHA on contact forms to prevent spam and has basic accessibility features. However, no explicit security headers beyond HTTPS were detected, and no security or incident response policies are published. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent, and form validation. The absence of WHOIS registrant data due to privacy protection slightly reduces trust but is common for small businesses. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site lacks a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, which could improve transparency. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a small hospitality and cultural business. Strategic improvements include adding security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility. The domain WHOIS data absence is noted but does not critically impact legitimacy given the business context.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention zameksvijany.cz, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for zameksvijany.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with zameksvijany.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zameksvijany.cz.