Skip to main content

Security report for zahrada.sk

Záhrada.sk · Media · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Záhrada.sk is a Slovak media platform dedicated to gardening enthusiasts, offering a rich collection of articles, a user forum, a marketplace, photoblogs, and a directory of garden professionals. The website targets Slovak gardeners and hobbyists, positioning itself as a community-driven resource with active user engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and consent management platforms to comply with GDPR. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization, although accessibility could be improved. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers in place, but the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages is a notable compliance gap. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, serving a medium-sized audience in the Slovak gardening niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zahrada.sk

This scan found 26 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zahrada.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
101
Employees
0
Customers
101
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
36%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zahrada.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform leverages content publishing combined with community features to engage users and generate revenue primarily through advertising. Its partnerships with related Slovak lifestyle and home improvement sites suggest a strategic ecosystem approach. The business model focuses on providing valuable gardening content and user interaction, fostering loyalty and repeat visits. The presence of a marketplace and professional directory indicates diversified service offerings. The company appears to be established since 2020, with consistent domain registration and no privacy protection, enhancing legitimacy. Social media integration supports brand visibility and user engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers, indicating a mature security posture. Use of consent management platforms demonstrates awareness of privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness communication. The site should consider publishing these documents and contacts to enhance trust and compliance. Regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins are recommended to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Include clear company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers for user support and compliance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Záhrada.sk
Description
Na Záhrada.sk nájdete články plné užitočných informácií, používateľské fórum a bazár, fotoblogy i zoznam záhradných profesionálov.
Key services
Gardening articles and magazine content, User forum for discussions, Marketplace (bazaar), Photoblogs, Directory of garden professionals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Yoast SEO plugin, Advanced Ads plugin, Quantcast Choice CMP, InMobi CMP
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management platform for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Advanced Ads, InMobi
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Quantcast Choice CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Slovak gardening media platform with active community features.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and standard CMS (WordPress).
  3. Implements GDPR consent management but lacks explicit privacy and terms pages.
  4. No signs of malicious content or security blocking.
  5. Good SEO and social media integration.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  7. Advertising and tracking are present but managed with consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK. It uses Yoast SEO for optimization and Advanced Ads for monetization. The site loads a variety of external scripts and stylesheets efficiently, with lazy loading for images improving performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and some technical debt related to legacy scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and scalable platform for content delivery and user interaction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zahrada.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zahrada.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.