Skip to main content

Security report for yourweather.co.uk

Meteored · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yourweather.co.uk, operated under the Meteored brand, is a UK-focused weather information website providing 14-day forecasts, meteorological news, videos, and weather widgets. The site targets a general audience interested in weather updates and scientific weather-related content. It maintains a consistent brand presence with apps available across major platforms and active social media channels. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, integrates advertising and tracking services such as Google Tag Manager and DoubleClick, and uses HTTPS with strong security headers, ensuring a secure browsing experience. However, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to a Nominet UK naming rules violation, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy but does not affect the website's operational status. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, though direct company contact emails and phone numbers are not publicly listed, relying instead on a contact form. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front with room for improvement in transparency of domain registration and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yourweather.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector, focusing on weather forecasting and meteorological news. It leverages advertising revenue through multiple ad networks and offers widgets and plugins for third-party websites, indicating a diversified revenue model. The presence of multiple related domains in different languages and regions suggests a broad partnership ecosystem under the Meteored brand. The target market is primarily UK residents and English-speaking users interested in weather information. The site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with modern web technologies and multi-platform app availability. Growth indicators include active content updates, video integration, and social media engagement. Strategic partnerships with related weather sites enhance market reach. However, the lack of visible company registration details and direct contact information may limit business credibility for some users.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of modern ad and tracking technologies is balanced with privacy compliance measures, including cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or a security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability management and incident handling. No known vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the site content or scripts. Recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response information and conducting regular third-party script audits to maintain security integrity. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance trust through improved security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure transparency.
  2. Verify and correct domain registration details with Nominet UK to resolve WHOIS data unavailability and enhance domain legitimacy.
  3. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising integrations to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meteored
Description
The 14-day weather forecast for the UK, hourly weather forecast and current conditions. Weather forecast for more than 200,000 cities around the world.
Key services
Weather forecasts, Meteorological news, Weather videos, Weather widgets and plugins
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google DoubleClick for Publishers, Prebid.js (header bidding), Dailymotion video integration, Custom event polyfill, CSS Grid and Flexbox
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS, Huawei AppGallery, Windows Store
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Prebid.js, Dailymotion Ads
Tracking pixels
Sensic.net
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and advertising networks.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules error.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  7. Social media presence is strong and consistent with brand.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  9. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front end with asynchronous loading of scripts and styles, including Google Tag Manager, Prebid.js for header bidding, and Dailymotion video integration. It employs CSS Grid and Flexbox for responsive layouts and supports multiple device platforms including Android, iOS, Huawei AppGallery, and Windows Store apps. Performance is moderate, with optimizations such as lazy loading images and deferred script loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter Card metadata. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses multiple external domains for content delivery, advertising, and analytics, which is typical for media sites but requires ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yourweather.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yourweather.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.