Skip to main content

Security report for yoursafari.co.uk

Your Safari · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Your Safari is a UK-based bespoke safari tour operator specializing in personalized African and Asian wildlife adventures, including Namibia self-drive tours, Okavango fly-in safaris, and Bengal Tiger expeditions. The business leverages the expertise of Kathryn Haylett, an experienced guide and author, to deliver tailored safari experiences. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. Technically, the site uses modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Formspree for secure form handling, and Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a domain registration error, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy but does not detract from the business credibility demonstrated on the site. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-positioned in the niche luxury safari market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yoursafari.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, targeting affluent wildlife travelers seeking bespoke safari experiences. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized itineraries designed by an expert guide with deep regional knowledge. Revenue streams likely include custom safari bookings and consultation services. The presence of Protected Trust Services membership enhances customer trust. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with itinerary platforms like Wetu and financial protection services. Growth indicators include active social media presence and detailed sample itineraries. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled, anonymized IP tracking in analytics, and secure form submissions. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could impact trust from a security perspective. The missing cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security risks are moderate and manageable but warrant improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS registration details and resolve any domain registration inconsistencies to maintain legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Your Safari
Description
Craft your dream African wildlife adventure. Specializing in bespoke Namibia self-drive tours, Okavango fly-in options, and expert-guided photographic safaris by Kathryn Haylett.
Key services
Bespoke Namibia self-drive tours, Okavango Delta fly-in safaris, Private Bengal Tiger safari expeditions, Personalized itinerary design and consultation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Formspree (form handling), Cloudflare (CDN and security), LocalImpact embed
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS with anonymized IP in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via Formspree
  • Use of Protected Trust Services badge

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing due to domain registration error from Nominet UK.
  4. Strong trust signals from Protected Trust Services membership and expert guide credentials.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR-relevant privacy policy.
  6. Secure form handling via Formspree with redirect on success.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and Google Analytics with IP anonymization.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards, using Google Fonts for typography, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Formspree for form handling. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloaded images and efficient CSS. However, the lack of detected CMS suggests a custom or static site, which may limit scalability. There is an opportunity to improve technical security by adding missing HTTP security headers and implementing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for enhancements in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yoursafari.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yoursafari.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.