Skip to main content

Security report for yellow-shop.cz

Yellow Point, spol. s r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yellow Point, spol. s r.o. operates an e-commerce platform specializing in the sale of experience gifts and adventure activities primarily in the Czech Republic. The website offers a variety of products such as gift certificates, adrenaline experiences, and seasonal activities, targeting general consumers seeking unique gift options. The company appears to hold a solid regional market position with a medium-sized business model focused on direct online sales and bookings. Technically, the website is built on the WPJ CMS platform and employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools including Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Adform, and Seznam retargeting. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Sentry error monitoring, but lack some advanced HTTP security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Contact information is transparent, enhancing business credibility. However, WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly limits domain trust analysis. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and secure for its business purpose. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility could further enhance its posture. The absence of WHOIS data is mitigated by strong on-site trust signals and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yellow-shop.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yellow Point operates in the hospitality and e-commerce sectors, focusing on experiential gifts and activities. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a broad range of curated experiences with immediate e-gift delivery and online payment options. The business model is direct-to-consumer via an online shop, targeting gift buyers and adventure seekers. Partnerships with related sites and a professional web development firm indicate a mature operational ecosystem. Growth potential exists through expanding activity offerings and enhancing digital marketing. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages multiple advertising and retargeting platforms to drive sales.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and error monitoring via Sentry. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, indicating compliance awareness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security.txt, incident response contacts, and advanced HTTP security headers suggests room for improvement. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Yellow Point, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yellow Point, spol. s r.o.
Description
E-shop offering gift certificates and experience activities such as adrenaline and seasonal experiences primarily in Špindlerův Mlýn and surrounding areas.
Key services
Gift certificates, Experience activities (e.g., zip line, bungee trampoline, electric bike rental), Online payment and booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Sentry, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Adform tracking, Seznam retargeting
Frameworks
WPJ CMS (wpj.cz)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Sentry error monitoring with filtering
  • Cookie consent banner with granular options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Google Adwords, Seznam retargeting
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4, Seznam retargeting
Marketing tools
Sentry
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms are implemented.
  4. Multiple tracking and advertising scripts are used with consent mechanisms.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with phone and email.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  8. Content is family-friendly and focused on experience gifts and activities.
  9. Navigation and filtering features are well implemented for product browsing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with WPJ CMS as the platform. It integrates multiple analytics and advertising tools including Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Adform, and Seznam retargeting. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of visible hosting provider data limits infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business model effectively but could be optimized for security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yellow-shop.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yellow-shop.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.