Skip to main content

Security report for xzw.com

星座屋 · Media · China

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

星座屋 is a Chinese-language astrology and horoscope website offering a wide range of content including zodiac signs, personality analysis, tarot card tutorials, dream interpretation, and psychological tests. It targets Chinese-speaking users interested in astrology and related lifestyle topics. The site is well-established with consistent branding and a moderate-sized audience. Technically, it uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and JavaScript, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but lacking advanced security headers and explicit privacy mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain transparency. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xzw.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector focusing on astrology and lifestyle content. It leverages advertising and user engagement through various interactive features like quizzes and tarot readings. The presence of ICP and content licenses indicates regulatory compliance in China. The site has a broad partnership ecosystem with many external linked domains, mostly content and social media related. The business model is content-driven with monetization likely through ads and possibly affiliate marketing. The target audience is primarily Chinese-speaking astrology enthusiasts. The lack of explicit company contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact business credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is published. There is no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a compliance gap under privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site uses third-party analytics scripts from Baidu and CNZZ, which implies moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be enhanced by implementing security headers, privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent banners and privacy notices to enhance privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to build trust.
  4. Improve accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data inconsistencies to improve domain transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
星座屋
Description
星座屋专业星座运程预测网，提供星座、个性、开运方法、运势、配对、解梦以及心理测试、血型、生肖、塔罗牌、算命、风水等星相命理信息。
Key services
Horoscope and astrology content, Zodiac and blood type personality analysis, Tarot card tutorials and readings, Psychological tests, Dream interpretation, Chinese lunar calendar and fortune, Astrological chart analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics, CNZZ
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics, CNZZ
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language focused on astrology and related topics.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, indicating partial privacy compliance.
  5. Website uses Baidu and CNZZ analytics for user tracking.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is mainly via forms and social media links.
  7. Site has ICP and content licenses indicating compliance with Chinese regulations.
  8. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or NSFW material.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery. It loads multiple JavaScript files for common functions and site features. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. There is no indication of modern frameworks like React or Angular. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site uses Baidu and CNZZ analytics for tracking. Technical debt is low but security and privacy features could be modernized.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xzw.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xzw.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.