Skip to main content

Security report for xxxx.cafe

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Media · Iceland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website xxxx.cafe is an adult entertainment platform specializing in free porn video streaming with a large catalog of videos categorized by tags, models, and tube sources. It targets an adult audience exclusively and operates a niche business model typical for adult content aggregators. The site was founded in 2022 and uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is common in this industry. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, and supports HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The user experience is good with clear navigation and mobile optimization, though privacy compliance is limited due to absence of cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed for its niche but should enhance privacy and security practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xxxx.cafe

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

xxxx.cafe operates in the adult media sector, providing free pornographic video content with frequent updates. Its business model relies on advertising revenue and possibly affiliate marketing, as indicated by embedded ad iframes and tracking pixels. The site targets adult consumers seeking diverse adult video content. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS and lack of direct contact emails is typical for this market segment. The platform supports user accounts and content management, indicating some level of community engagement. The site’s market position is that of a specialized adult content aggregator rather than a premium content provider. Growth potential depends on content freshness and advertising monetization. Partnerships appear limited to advertising networks and external tube sources.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, which provides a baseline of security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site collects user input via search and contact forms but lacks visible advanced input sanitization indicators. Tracking via Yandex Metrika and third-party ad networks introduces privacy considerations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and transparency policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding verified contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Website offering hundreds of new porn videos uploaded daily with fresh and exciting adult content.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Video categorization by tags, models, categories, and tube sources, User accounts with video and album management, RSS feeds for video and album updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Fonts, AddToAny sharing, Yandex Metrika
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
labadena.com
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult video streaming platform with extensive video content and categorization.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  3. Use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for adult content sites.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact form available.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers.
  7. Advertising is present via third-party ad iframes and tracking pixels.
  8. Content is clearly adult and NSFW with explicit keywords and video titles.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a modern JavaScript tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js, and Google Fonts. It integrates third-party services such as Yandex Metrika for analytics and AddToAny for social sharing. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. The site architecture supports extensive video content with categorization and user account features. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks or reduce user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xxxx.cafe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xxxx.cafe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.