Skip to main content

Security report for xxxmovies.wiki

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Media · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

XXXmovies.wiki is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of pornographic videos across a wide range of categories. The site targets adult users seeking explicit content and monetizes primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing partnerships. The domain is recently registered in 2024 under Danesco Trading Ltd., an Estonian company, consistent with the website's business model and content. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery and lazy loading for images, with moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. However, it lacks advanced security measures such as DNSSEC and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating low privacy compliance. No direct contact or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and trust. Overall, the site is functional but basic in design and security, with a clear focus on adult content delivery and monetization through ads.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xxxmovies.wiki

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector, offering a large catalog of free pornographic videos. Its business model relies on high traffic volumes monetized via ad networks like ExoClick and affiliate programs such as Trafokit. The target audience is adults seeking diverse adult content. The site shows moderate branding consistency but lacks trust signals such as certifications or verified contact information. The domain's recent registration aligns with the site's new launch, and partnerships with known adult ad networks support its monetization strategy. Growth potential depends on traffic acquisition and ad revenue optimization. The absence of privacy and security policies may pose compliance risks in regulated markets.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak. It lacks essential security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, increasing exposure to certain attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which is a compliance gap. The site uses HTTPS (implied by URL) but no explicit SSL configuration details are available. The presence of third-party ad scripts and redirects to suspicious domains like wv.vyoning.cfd may introduce security risks. Overall, the site does not demonstrate mature security practices and should improve transparency and technical controls to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reporting.
  5. Review and vet third-party ad networks and external domains to reduce exposure to malicious content.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
XXXmovies.wiki is an adult entertainment website offering free access to millions of pornographic videos including categories such as amateurs, stepfamily porn, milfs, homemade private sex tapes, and more.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Adult content categorization, Advertising and affiliate marketing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Vanilla LazyLoad 12.4.0, Google Fonts (Oswald), AdSpyglass ads, HTML5 video
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS is implied by URL but no explicit headers provided
  • No DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdSpyglass, ExoClick, Trafokit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult video streaming platform with extensive pornographic content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Heavy use of advertising and affiliate marketing networks.
  5. No visible security best practices such as security headers or incident response info.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is recently registered.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  8. Content is explicitly adult and NSFW.
  9. Site uses common JS libraries and lazy loading for images.
  10. External links include adult ad networks and related adult sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard HTML5 structure with jQuery 3.6.0 and Vanilla LazyLoad for image optimization. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is hosted on servers associated with hostiservices.com. Performance is moderate with lazy loading improving load times. Mobile optimization is good with viewport and responsive meta tags present. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or advanced frameworks are identified, indicating a custom or lightweight platform. The site relies heavily on third-party ad scripts which may impact performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xxxmovies.wiki. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xxxmovies.wiki.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.