Skip to main content

Security report for xvideosonly.net

ClubeOnlyFans.Com · Media · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website xvideosonly.net operates as a small-scale adult content platform primarily targeting Brazilian Portuguese-speaking audiences interested in free pornographic videos, especially leaked or free content from OnlyFans, Privacy, and Close Friends platforms. The business model relies on free content delivery supported by advertising and affiliate marketing partnerships with related adult sites. The site is built on WordPress, uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS with a domain registered recently in 2024. Technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing several best practices and compliance mechanisms. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or GDPR compliance features. Business credibility is limited by the absence of clear contact information and professional trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xvideosonly.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention xvideosonly.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for xvideosonly.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the adult media sector, focusing on free access to content that is often behind paywalls on platforms like OnlyFans. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating and distributing such content freely, attracting a specific audience segment. Revenue streams appear to be primarily advertising and affiliate marketing. The site links to multiple partner domains that serve similar content or provide advertising services. Growth potential depends on content freshness and traffic volume. However, lack of transparent business information and compliance may limit partnerships with reputable advertisers or payment processors.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. While HTTPS is enforced, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like man-in-the-middle attacks or clickjacking. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, and no security contact channels are provided. Forms for login and password reset exist but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are evident. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking via Google Analytics. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and lacks a mature security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish clear contact information and security/incident response policies to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ClubeOnlyFans.Com
Description
Xvideos Onlyfans ✓ Assistir videos porno com famosas nuas do Privacy, Close Friends, Xvideos Onlyfans Grátis e muito mais no melhor site do mundo.
Key services
Free streaming of adult videos, Affiliate marketing for related adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login forms present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
hqporno.com.br ad iframe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based adult content site focused on free OnlyFans and related leaked videos.
  2. Content is in Brazilian Portuguese targeting adult viewers interested in free pornographic content.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; no visible business contact transparency.
  4. No cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms detected despite EU-related meta tags.
  5. Security posture is basic with HTTPS but lacking security headers and DNSSEC.
  6. Advertising and affiliate marketing are present but with limited transparency.
  7. No terms of service or incident response policies found.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent with a recently created domain for this purpose.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.1 with standard themes and plugins including Font Awesome and jQuery. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for user tracking. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare but does not use Cloudflare's WAF or security challenge features. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security best practices. The domain is newly registered and consistent with the website's content freshness. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xvideosonly.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xvideosonly.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.