Skip to main content

Security report for xn--sljafakturor-gcb.se

Sälja fakturor · Finance · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Sälja fakturor' offers financial services focused on invoice selling, factoring, and invoice financing to Swedish businesses. It positions itself as a niche provider helping companies improve cash flow by enabling faster payment through invoice sales. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and uses modern web technologies including WordPress, Elementor, and CleanTalk anti-spam solutions. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for user behavior tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, though lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The domain is registered with a reputable Swedish registrar since 2013, consistent with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but should improve privacy compliance and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xn--sljafakturor-gcb.se

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets Swedish SMEs needing liquidity solutions by selling invoices. It leverages partnerships with financial loan providers (Qred and Froda) to offer complementary services. The business model is based on factoring and invoice purchasing, generating revenue from fees on sold invoices. The website content is comprehensive, educating visitors on invoice selling benefits, processes, and costs. Customer testimonials and Trustpilot ratings enhance credibility. The company appears small but established, with a focus on user-friendly digital integration with accounting systems like Fortnox and Visma. The lack of explicit company registration or VAT details on the site is a minor gap. The partnership ecosystem and content marketing via blog articles indicate a growth-oriented strategy.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS encryption, CleanTalk anti-spam and bot detection, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the site does not explicitly implement or advertise key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No published security policy or incident response contacts reduce transparency for security incidents. The absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. Forms are protected by anti-spam but no visible CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication is noted. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sälja fakturor
Description
Sälja fakturor är en tjänst som erbjuder snabb hantering och betalning av fakturor genom factoring och fakturaköp, vilket frigör kapital och ökar likviditeten för företag.
Key services
Factoring, Fakturaköp (Invoice purchasing), Fakturabelåning (Invoice financing), Financial advisory for invoice sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Rank Math SEO, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CleanTalk anti-spam plugin
  • Bot detection scripts included
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact form collects company name, email, and phone number with anti-spam protection.
  4. Use of CleanTalk anti-spam and bot detection enhances security posture.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in the content.
  7. Multiple internal pages linked for services like factoring, invoice purchase, and financing.
  8. Content is in Swedish and targets Swedish businesses.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern plugins like Rank Math SEO and CleanTalk for SEO and spam protection. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used for tracking. The site uses jQuery and WP Rocket for performance optimization. Hosting is via Loopia AB, a reputable Swedish provider. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly with preconnect and preload hints. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is mature and well maintained, though some security best practices could be enhanced.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xn--sljafakturor-gcb.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xn--sljafakturor-gcb.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.