Skip to main content

Security report for xn--hlsodeklaration-0kb.fi

Veripalvelu · Healthcare · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a health questionnaire service for blood donors operated by Veripalvelu, the Finnish Blood Service. It facilitates donor suitability assessment to ensure safety for both donors and recipients. The site is targeted at blood donors in Finland and provides multilingual support with Swedish as the default language. The business operates in the healthcare sector as a public health service provider with a medium organizational size and a national market position. Technically, the website uses a custom form system built on jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap, and other JavaScript libraries. It is mobile-optimized and accessible, with moderate performance. The site enforces HTTPS and uses anti-CSRF tokens in forms, but lacks explicit security headers. No cookies or tracking scripts are present, indicating a privacy-conscious design. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement, input validation, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-aware, serving a critical public health function. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing cookie consent if cookies are introduced in the future.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xn--hlsodeklaration-0kb.fi

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention xn--hlsodeklaration-0kb.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for xn--hlsodeklaration-0kb.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Veripalvelu operates as Finland's national blood service, providing essential health questionnaires and donor suitability assessments. The business model is non-profit and public health-oriented, focusing on safety and compliance. The website supports donor engagement with clear instructions, multilingual support, and accessible design. The presence of a dedicated info phone number indicates strong customer support. The lack of advertising and tracking reflects a focus on trust and privacy. The company maintains a consistent brand and operates in a regulated healthcare environment, which supports its market position and credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and form protections such as anti-CSRF tokens. Input validation and user warnings are implemented to reduce data entry errors. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder transparency and rapid response to security events. The site does not use cookies or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism if cookies or tracking technologies are introduced in the future to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Regularly review and update form input validation and session management to maintain security and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veripalvelu
Description
Blood donation health questionnaire service provided by Veripalvelu, the Finnish Blood Service, facilitating donor suitability assessment and blood donation safety.
Key services
Blood donor health questionnaires, Blood donation suitability assessment, Information and support for blood donors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap, Calx (jQuery spreadsheet plugin), Custom JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No cookies used
  • Form input validation and warnings
  • Anti-CSRF tokens present in form hidden fields
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a health questionnaire for blood donors operated by Finnish Blood Service.
  2. Content is in Swedish with language selection available.
  3. No cookies or tracking scripts detected.
  4. No social media links or email addresses explicitly found.
  5. Phone contact number provided for donor support.
  6. No privacy or cookie banners present, but privacy policy is linked.
  7. Form uses multiple hidden tokens likely for session and CSRF protection.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  9. Site uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built form platform leveraging jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap, and additional JavaScript libraries such as Calx for spreadsheet-like functionality. The design is responsive and accessible, supporting multiple languages with dynamic language switching. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external dependencies or analytics scripts detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS but lacks some modern security headers. The form includes multiple hidden tokens likely for session and CSRF protection. There is no evidence of a CMS, indicating a bespoke or proprietary solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modern security enhancements and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xn--hlsodeklaration-0kb.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xn--hlsodeklaration-0kb.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.