Skip to main content

Security report for xjeans.lv

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.xjeans.eu is an e-commerce platform specializing in retailing clothing and accessories primarily targeting Finnish and Baltic region consumers. The product catalog includes men's, women's, and children's apparel with a focus on jeans and casual wear. The site supports multiple languages and offers customer incentives such as free shipping over certain order values and loyalty discounts. The business model is typical of a small regional online retailer with a clear focus on fashion apparel. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Flickity for sliders, FontAwesome for icons, and Instafeed.js for Instagram integration. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS for secure communications. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the data available. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness but basic accessibility and SEO features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible GDPR compliance indicators. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for small e-commerce businesses but reduces transparency. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation but gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, improving accessibility, and maintaining regular security audits to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xjeans.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and e-commerce sector focusing on apparel and accessories. Its market positioning is regional with a focus on Finnish and Baltic customers. The company leverages online sales channels with multi-language support to broaden reach. Competitive advantages include a diverse product range, free shipping offers, and customer loyalty discounts. Revenue streams are primarily from direct online sales. The target customer segment is fashion-conscious consumers seeking casual and denim wear. Growth indicators include active social media presence and promotional campaigns. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes external domains for fonts and social media. Operationally, the company appears to be a small-sized retailer with consistent branding and good content quality.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and forms appear secure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating good baseline security hygiene. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR adherence. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting transparency in security management. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical but reduces registrant transparency. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online retail store specializing in clothing and accessories for men, women, and children, with a focus on jeans and casual wear.
Key services
Online sales of clothing and accessories, Free shipping over certain order value, Customer loyalty discounts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Flickity, FontAwesome, Instafeed.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Finnish language e-commerce store selling clothing and accessories.
  2. Content is well structured with multi-language support.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. No WHOIS registrant data available due to privacy protection.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Social media presence on Instagram is linked.
  9. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Flickity for carousel functionality, and FontAwesome for icons. Instagram integration is done via Instafeed.js. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. The HTML structure is well organized with multi-level navigation menus supporting multiple languages. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in SEO and accessibility. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and user-friendly e-commerce experience but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xjeans.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xjeans.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.