Skip to main content

Security report for wwkarena.com

WWK Lebensversicherung a. G. · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WWK Lebensversicherung a. G. operates the WWK ARENA official website, providing comprehensive information about the stadium in Augsburg, Germany. The site serves fans and visitors with details on ticketing, hospitality, sustainability, and visitor services, positioning itself as a key digital touchpoint for the stadium experience. The business model focuses on information dissemination and enhancing visitor engagement, supported by strong branding aligned with the parent insurance company WWK. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integrates third-party services like YouTube and eTracker analytics, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Accessibility is enhanced by tools such as Eye-Able, reflecting a commitment to inclusive design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no evident vulnerabilities, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting the business's digital presence effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wwkarena.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wwkarena.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wwkarena.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The WWK ARENA website is strategically positioned as the official digital platform for the stadium associated with FC Augsburg and WWK Versicherungen. It leverages partnerships with the football club and the parent insurance company to provide authoritative content. The business benefits from a medium-sized market presence in the hospitality and sports sectors, targeting a broad audience including fans, visitors, and local community members. Revenue streams likely include hospitality services and sponsorships, though direct e-commerce is limited to ticketing links. The site’s integration with social media and external domains supports a robust partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include sustainability initiatives and visitor engagement features. The business model emphasizes brand reinforcement and customer experience enhancement rather than direct sales.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No critical security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for enhancement in HTTP response headers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contacts indicates a potential compliance gap. The use of third-party analytics (eTracker) is managed with user consent, reflecting privacy awareness. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from implementing additional security best practices such as DNSSEC, security headers, and a formal vulnerability disclosure policy.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy disclosures with detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WWK Lebensversicherung a. G.
Description
Offizielle Website der WWK ARENA in Augsburg mit Informationen zu Anreise, Zahlen & Fakten, Gastronomie und mehr.
Key services
Stadium information, Ticketing links, Visitor services, Hospitality, Sustainability information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, YouTube embed, OneTrust Cookie Consent, eTracker analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
eTracker
Marketing tools
eTracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with OneTrust.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  4. Social media links are present and consistent with the business.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. Good accessibility features including visual assistance tool Eye-Able.
  8. Use of eTracker for analytics with cookie consent.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with integration of third-party services such as YouTube for video content and eTracker for analytics. The presence of OneTrust cookie consent indicates compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features like the Eye-Able visual assistance tool. Hosting and DNS are managed via united-domains GmbH and dodns.net respectively, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance appears moderate with deferred and async script loading. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by adopting modern security headers and DNSSEC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wwkarena.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wwkarena.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.