Skip to main content

Security report for wrong.lv

WRONG · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WRONG DIGITAL is a creative digital agency based in Latvia, serving the Baltic region with services including design, campaign creation, website development, and social media content production. The company positions itself as a leading agency in its market niche, targeting businesses seeking innovative digital solutions. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with a focus on creative services and client engagement through portfolio showcases and social media integration. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and includes interactive 3D content, indicating a moderate to advanced digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, representing a compliance risk. Overall, the site is credible and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wrong.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wrong.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wrong.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WRONG DIGITAL operates as a small-sized digital agency founded in 2019, focusing on creative digital marketing and web development services. Its market positioning is strong within Latvia and the Baltic states, leveraging a portfolio of recent projects and active social media channels. The business model centers on service provision to brands and companies requiring digital transformation and marketing campaigns. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing social media management. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and professional online presence, though lacks visible certifications or formal trust badges. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth indicators include recent work highlights and active content updates.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface, but data collection via Google Tag Manager is active without clear user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears nascent and would benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  4. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Review and document data retention policies and user consent mechanisms for analytics and tracking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WRONG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WRONG
Description
Wrong ir adošā digitālā aģentūra Latvijā, Baltijā – radām dizainus, veidojam kampaņas un mājas lapas, ko novērtē. Radām sociālo mediju saturu, ko pamana.
Key services
Radošie risinājumi, Sociālie mediji, Web izstrāde, Studija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Spline 3D runtime
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital agency site targeting Latvian and Baltic markets
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone
  5. Uses modern web technologies and includes 3D interactive content
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented
  7. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking
  8. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. It incorporates advanced interactive 3D content via the Spline runtime, indicating a modern and engaging user experience. Hosting and domain registration are managed by 1API GmbH with DNS parking services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical risks. The site lacks visible forms on the homepage, reducing complexity but also limiting direct user data collection points. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wrong.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wrong.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.