Skip to main content

Security report for wolterskluwerfs.com

Wolters Kluwer · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wolters Kluwer Financial and Corporate Compliance is a division of Wolters Kluwer N.V., a global leader providing technology-enabled compliance, regulatory, and corporate services solutions primarily targeting financial institutions, corporations, and legal professionals. The website presents a professional, well-branded digital presence with comprehensive content describing their portfolio of compliance and regulatory products and services. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies, including Cloudflare CDN, Azure DNS, and marketing/analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and lack of enabled TLS protocols, which severely impacts the security posture and trustworthiness of the site. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with consent mechanisms, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the site reflects a mature enterprise business with strong branding and content quality but requires urgent remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to meet security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wolterskluwerfs.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance and legal compliance sectors, serving a broad customer base including banks, credit unions, insurers, corporations, and law firms. Their business model focuses on delivering software and services that help clients manage regulatory compliance, risk, and corporate governance efficiently. The presence of multiple subsidiary brands and solutions indicates a diversified portfolio. The website's integration with marketing and analytics platforms suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and product development. The company maintains a strong market position as a global leader with a focus on innovation and regulatory expertise. Partnerships and related domains support their ecosystem, enhancing service delivery and customer reach.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential interception and trust issues. Security headers are properly configured, and cookies have secure and HttpOnly flags, indicating some adherence to security best practices. No known vulnerabilities or malware are detected, but the absence of HTTPS is a critical flaw. The site lacks published security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is strong, with cookie consent and privacy policies in place. Immediate action is recommended to install a valid SSL certificate and enable modern TLS protocols to protect data in transit and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or higher.
  2. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and cookie settings to maintain best practices.
  5. Enhance contact information by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Cloudflare CDN, Azure DNS, Bootstrap 4 framework, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, OneTrust, Mouseflow, and DebugBear. The CMS appears to be a proprietary Wolters Kluwer platform (OneWeb). The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically deficient, lacking a valid certificate and enabled protocols, which poses a risk to secure communications. Performance data is unavailable, but the use of CDNs and asynchronous script loading suggests a focus on optimization. The site architecture is well structured with clear navigation and comprehensive content, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wolterskluwerfs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wolterskluwerfs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.