Skip to main content

Security report for wolford.com

Wolford · Retail · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wolford operates an international e-commerce retail website specializing in fashion products, targeting multiple countries with localized language versions. The site is built on Salesforce Commerce Cloud (Demandware) and uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. Cloudflare is used as a hosting and CDN provider. However, the website lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no proper HTTPS support, which is a critical security concern. The site implements some security headers but misses important configurations such as HSTS and OCSP stapling. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. Contact information and security policies are not found in the analyzed content, reducing transparency and trust. Overall, the website demonstrates a basic level of technical and business maturity but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wolford.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wolford is positioned as a large retail company in the fashion sector with a broad international presence, evidenced by multiple country and language-specific site versions. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales. The use of Salesforce Commerce Cloud indicates investment in scalable e-commerce infrastructure. Marketing and analytics tools such as Marketing Cloud Analytics and CQuotient suggest active customer engagement and data-driven marketing strategies. However, the absence of visible contact details and legal policies on the main page may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers are implemented, critical protections like HSTS and OCSP stapling are missing. The site uses secure cookie attributes but does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, limiting transparency for security researchers. No incident response contact channels are visible. The presence of Usercentrics CMP indicates some attention to privacy compliance, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service reduces overall compliance confidence. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and publication of security and privacy policies are recommended to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce secure connections.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Salesforce Commerce Cloud (Demandware) platform, leveraging Demandware analytics and CQuotient for customer activity tracking. It uses Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA for UI and bot protection. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant technical deficiency. Performance data is unavailable, but the presence of deferred scripts and preconnect hints suggests some optimization efforts. The site supports multiple languages and countries, indicating a complex localization setup. Accessibility and SEO optimizations appear basic, with no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and improved content completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wolford.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wolford.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.